Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38224400›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2024

Artificial intelligence-based three-dimensional templating for total joint arthroplasty planning: a scoping review.

Ausberto Velasquez Garcia, Lainey G Bukowiec, Linjun Yang, Hiroki Nishikawa, James S Fitzsimmons, A Noelle Larson, Michael J Taunton, Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo, Shawn W O'Driscoll, Cody C Wyles

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. [Orthopedics and trauma surgery in the digital age].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ausberto Velasquez GarciaMayo Clinic Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4135-2235
Lainey G BukowiecMayo Clinic Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8449-1040
Linjun YangMayo Clinic Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1430-3355
Hiroki NishikawaMayo Clinic Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1689-9834
James S FitzsimmonsMayo Clinic Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0415-3779
A Noelle LarsonMayo Clinic Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6542-6975
Michael J TauntonMayo Clinic Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7636-0489
Joaquin Sanchez-SoteloMayo Clinic Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3199-3247
Shawn W O'DriscollMayo Clinic Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8225-3372
Cody C WylesMayo Clinic Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. Wyles.Cody@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8629-7567

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this review is to evaluate the current status of research on the application of artificial intelligence (AI)-based three-dimensional (3D) templating in preoperative planning of total joint arthroplasty.

methodsThis scoping review followed the PRISMA, PRISMA-ScR guidelines, and five stage methodological framework for scoping reviews. Studies of patients undergoing primary or revision joint arthroplasty surgery that utilised AI-based 3D templating for surgical planning were included. Outcome measures included dataset and model development characteristics, AI performance metrics, and time performance. After AI-based 3D planning, the accuracy of component size and placement estimation and postoperative outcome data were collected.

resultsNine studies satisfied inclusion criteria including a focus on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based AI templating for use in hip or knee arthroplasty. AI-based 3D templating systems reduced surgical planning time and improved implant size/position and imaging feature estimation compared to conventional radiographic templating. Several components of data processing and model development and testing were insufficiently covered in the studies included in this scoping review.

conclusionsAI-based 3D templating systems have the potential to improve preoperative planning for joint arthroplasty surgery. This technology offers more accurate and personalized preoperative planning, which has potential to improve functional outcomes for patients. However, deficiencies in several key areas, including data handling, model development, and testing, can potentially hinder the reproducibility and reliability of the methods proposed. As such, further research is needed to definitively evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of these systems.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeArtificial IntelligenceImaging, Three-DimensionalHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPreoperative CareSurgery, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray Computed3D imaging3D templatingArthroplastyArtificial intelligenceSurgical planningTotal hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.