Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38224331›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2024

Astigmatism Influences Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis in Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Imaging.

Lourdes Vidal-Oliver, Roberto Gallego-Pinazo, Rosa Dolz-Marco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Regional choroidal perfusion deficits and vector-based choroidal associations in adolescent astigmatism.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lourdes Vidal-OliverFundación Oftalmología Médica de la Comunidad Valenciana, Valencia, Spain.
Roberto Gallego-PinazoMacula Unit, Oftalvist Clinic, Valencia, Spain.
Rosa Dolz-MarcoMacula Unit, Oftalvist Clinic, Valencia, Spain.
IVI Valencia Clinic · ESFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper was to study the influence of astigmatism in optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images in a quantitative and qualitative analysis. Methods: This was a prospective, cross-sectional study. We included 110 eyes of 110 patients: 20 eyes without astigmatism and 90 eyes with astigmatism ≥0.5 diopters (D). We performed a macula centered OCTA as a reference image. In patients without astigmatism, registered follow-up scans were performed after induction of -1 and -2 D astigmatism. In patients with astigmatism, we performed the follow-up scan after astigmatism correction. We used a set of cylindrical lenses attached to the camera head of the SPECTRALIS (Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). A quantitative and qualitative analysis of the superficial vascular complex (SVC) and deep vascular complex (DVC) was performed. The main outcome measures were vessel density (VD), image quality, and the presence of artifacts. Results: Mean VD of the SVC was significantly higher in the reference images compared with the images after induction of -2 D. Differences with -1 D were nonsignificant. Higher degrees of astigmatisms had higher VD dropout (0.012-0.02 per diopter in SVC). Astigmatism axis showed no relevance in our cohort. Image quality assessed by two independent observers was graded as higher in images without astigmatism. Defocus and attenuation were more prevalent in images with astigmatism. Conclusions: Astigmatism of -2 D affects quantification of VD in OCTA images, mainly affecting the SVC, as well as the subjective quality assessment. Correction of this refractive error might be necessary for an accurate quantitative assessment of OCTA images. Translational Relevance: Correcting astigmatism of 2 D or greater appears to be necessary when analyzing OCTA images.

Indexed as

AstigmatismMacula LuteaAngiographyCross-Sectional StudiesHumansProspective StudiesTomography, Optical Coherence

Identifiers

PMID38224331
PMCPMC10795549
OpenAlexW4390876630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.