Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38224266›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2024

Direct mailing of HPV self-sampling kits to women aged 50-65 non-participating in cervical screening in the Czech Republic.

Ondřej Ngo, Renata Chloupková, David Cibula, Jiří Sláma, Lucie Mandelová, Karel Hejduk, Marián Hajdúch, Petr Minka, Vladimíra Koudeláková, Hana Jaworek and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06253169 (Benefit of Self-sampling for HPV DNA in a General Practitioner's Office to Improve Participation in Cervical Screening - The ASTRA Study.), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06253169 unknown statusnot on this map

Benefit of Self-sampling for HPV DNA in a General Practitioner's Office to Improve Participation in Cervical Screening - The ASTRA Study.

TypeobservationalSponsorPatient Organization VeronicaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled2,000ConditionsCervical Cancer, HPV Infection, Precancerous LesionArmsHPV DNA self-test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Cervical cancer screening strategies in women 65 years and older in the human papillomavirus era: A systematic review and meta-analysis of human papillomavirus-based testing and self-sampling approaches.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ondřej NgoInstitute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Renata ChloupkováInstitute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
David CibulaDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Jiří SlámaDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Neonatology, General University Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Lucie MandelováInstitute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Karel HejdukInstitute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Marián HajdúchInstitute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Petr MinkaRBP, Health Insurance Company, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Vladimíra KoudelákováInstitute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Hana JaworekInstitute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Markéta TrnkováUnilabs Pathology K. S., Prague, Czech Republic.
Peter VaněkInstitute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
Vladimír DvořákCentre of Outpatient Gynaecology and Primary Care, Brno, Czech Republic.
Ladislav DušekInstitute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.
Ondřej MájekInstitute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

EATRIS-CZ CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_013/0001818European Social Fund, Operation Programme Employment CZ.03.2.63/0.0/0.0/15_039/0008171European Union
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA population-based cervical cancer screening programme is implemented in the Czech Republic. However, participation is insufficient among women over 50 years. This study aimed to estimate the potential improvement in participation through directly mailed HPV self-sampling kits (HPVssk) compared with standard invitation letters in women aged 50-65 non-participating in screening.

methodsThe study recruited 1564 eligible women (no cervical cancer screening in the last 3 years or more, no previous treatment associated with cervical lesions or cervical cancer). Eight hundred women were mailed with an HPVssk (HPVssk group), and 764 women were sent a standard invitation letter (control group) inviting them to a routine screening (Pap test). The primary outcome was a comparison of the overall participation rate between study groups using a binominal regression model.

resultsThe participation rate in the HPVssk group was 13.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 11.2-15.9%; 7.4% of women returned the HPVssk and 6.0% attended gynaecological examination] and 5.0% (95% CI 3.6-6.8%) in the control group. Using the binominal regression model, the difference between the groups was estimated as 7.6% (95% CI 5.0-10.2%; P < 0.001). In the HPVssk group, 22% of women who returned HPVssk had a positive result and 70% of them underwent a follow-up examination.

conclusionsCompared with traditional invitation letters, the direct mailing of the HPVssk achieved a significantly higher participation rate, along with a notable HPV positivity rate among HPVssk responders. This approach offers a potentially viable method for engaging women who have not yet attended a cervical screening programme.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsCzech RepublicEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMass ScreeningVaginal Smears

Identifiers

PMID38224266
PMCPMC10990530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.