Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38224254›Full record

ArticleEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2024

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients requiring prolonged mechanical circulatory support after high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention.

Sugi Min, Mir Babar Basir, Alejandro Lemor, Zhipeng Zhou, Arsalan Abu-Much, Björn Redfors, Julia B Thompson, Alexander G Truesdell, Aditya S Bharadwaj, Yanru Li and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Patient selection for complex, high-risk indicated percutaneous coronary intervention procedures: an overview.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. High-risk PCI: one device cannot fix it all.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Sugi MinDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Mir Babar BasirDivision of Cardiology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Alejandro LemorDepartment of Cardiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA.
Zhipeng ZhouClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Arsalan Abu-MuchClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Björn RedforsClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Julia B ThompsonClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Alexander G TruesdellVirginia Heart, Falls Church, VA, USA.
Aditya S BharadwajDivision of Cardiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.
Yanru LiClinical Trials Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, NY, USA.
Amir KakiInterventional Cardiology Department, Ascension St. John Hospital and Center, Detroit, MI, USA.
Brigitta C BrottDivision of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Medicine, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
David H WohnsSpectrum Health, Frederik Meijer Heart and Vascular Institute, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
Perwaiz M MerajDepartment of Cardiology, Zucker School of Medicine, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York, NY, USA.
Ramesh DaggubatiDivision of Cardiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Cindy L GrinesMedical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, USA.
William W O'NeillCenter for Structural Heart Disease, Department of Cardiology, Henry Ford Health Care System, Detroit, MI, USA.
Jeffrey W MosesDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Cardiovascular Research Foundation · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USAlaska Heart and Vascular Institute · USHenry Ford Hospital · USLoma Linda University Medical Center · USNorthside Hospital · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are limited data on the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients who require prolonged mechanical circulatory support (MCS) after Impella-supported high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI).

aimsThe aim of this study is to describe the contemporary clinical characteristics, outcomes, and predictors associated with prolonged MCS support after assisted HR-PCI.

methodsPatients enrolled in the prospective, multicentre, clinical endpoint-adjudicated PROTECT III study who had undergone HR-PCI using Impella were evaluated. Patient and procedural characteristics and outcomes for those who received prolonged MCS beyond the duration of their index procedure were compared to those in whom MCS was successfully weaned and explanted at the conclusion of the index PCI.

resultsAmong 1,155 patients who underwent HR-PCI with Impella between 2017 and 2020 and had sufficient data to confirm the duration of Impella support, 16.5% received prolonged MCS (mean duration 25.2±31.1 hours compared with 1.8±5.8 hours for those who only received intraprocedural MCS). Patients receiving prolonged support presented with more urgent indications (e.g., acute coronary syndromes [ACS], lower ejection fraction [EF], elevated baseline heart rate and lower systolic blood pressure). Use of the Impella CP, intraprocedural complications, periprocedural complications and in-hospital mortality were all more common amongst the prolonged MCS group. Prolonged MCS was associated with increased rates of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality at 90-day follow-up.

conclusionsPatients receiving prolonged MCS after Impella-supported HR-PCI presented with more ACS, reduced EF and less favourable haemodynamics. Additionally, they were more likely to experience intraprocedural and periprocedural complications as well as increased in-hospital and post-discharge mortality.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromePercutaneous Coronary InterventionAftercareHumansPatient DischargeProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38224254
PMCPMC10786176
OpenAlexW4390831633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.