Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38224164›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2024

Food provision to support improved nutrition and well-being of people experiencing disadvantage - perspectives of service providers.

Verena T Vaiciurgis, A K Clancy, K E Charlton, A Stefoska-Needham, E J Beck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Verena T VaiciurgisSchool of Medical, Indigenous and Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, Building 41 Room 226, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW2522, Australia.
A K ClancySchool of Medical, Indigenous and Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, Building 41 Room 226, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW2522, Australia.
K E CharltonSchool of Medical, Indigenous and Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, Building 41 Room 226, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW2522, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8044-444X
A Stefoska-NeedhamSchool of Medical, Indigenous and Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, Building 41 Room 226, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW2522, Australia.
E J BeckSchool of Medical, Indigenous and Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health, Building 41 Room 226, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW2522, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3448-6534

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDiet quality is significantly impacted by social and environmental factors. People experiencing socio-economic disadvantage face inequitable barriers to accessing nutritious foods and health services, resulting in significant health disparities. This study aimed to explore the barriers faced by organisations that provide food support to people experiencing disadvantage as well as to identify potential strategies to enhance this support for improved well-being of clients.

designSemi-structured interviews using an exploratory approach and inductive thematic analysis.

settingAustralia.

participantsIndividuals from organisations involved in the provision of food support for people experiencing disadvantage aged ≥16 years.

resultsTwo major themes were identified from thirteen interviews. 'Dignity and respect for clients' serves as a guiding principle for food-related services across all organisations, while 'food' was a point of connection and a potential gateway to additional support pathways. Five additional subthemes included 'food as a platform to reduce social isolation, foster connection and promote participation', challenges with 'servicing clients with diverse experiences and needs', 'dependence on staff and volunteers with varying knowledge and skillsets', ensuring 'adequate access to services, resources and facilities' and 'necessity of community collaboration'.

conclusionsThis study highlights the unique position of organisations involved in food support to identify client-specific needs and implement broader holistic health support. Future interventions should prioritise dignity, respect and social connection in design. Organisations require an adequately trained, sustainable workforce, with shared or enhanced services, resources and facilities, and greater community coordination with other services to maximise effectiveness.

Indexed as

FoodNutritional StatusAustraliaHumansQualitative ResearchSocial IsolationDiet-related health inequalitiesFoodNutritionSocio-economic disadvantage

Identifiers

PMID38224164
PMCPMC10897568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.