Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38223900›Full record

ArticleNetwork science (Cambridge University Press)2023

Typologies of duocentric networks among low-income newlywed couples.

David P Kennedy, Thomas N Bradbury, Benjamin R Karney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Network science (Cambridge University Press), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David P KennedyRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.ORCID 000-0001-7742-1792
Thomas N BradburyUniversity of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Benjamin R KarneyRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA.

Funding

Development and Maintenance of Low-Income Newlywed MarriagesR01HD053825 · NICHD · RAND CORPORATION · PI KARNEY, BENJAMIN REUVEN · 2008 to 2012
$3.8M
A Social Network Analysis of Racial Disparities in Marital OutcomesR01HD076566 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI KARNEY, BENJAMIN REUVEN · 2013 to 2017
$3.7M
Economic Context and Marital Outcomes Over TimeR01HD091832 · NICHD · RAND CORPORATION · PI KARNEY, BENJAMIN REUVEN · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD053825NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD076566NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD091832
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The social networks surrounding intimate couples provide them with bonding and bridging social capital and have been theorized to be associated with their well-being and relationship quality. These networks are multidimensional, featuring compositional (e.g., the proportion of family members vs. friends) and structural characteristics (e.g., density, degree of overlap between spouses' networks). Most previous studies of couple networks are based on partners' global ratings of their network characteristics or network data collected from one member of the dyad. This study presents the analysis of "duocentric networks" or the combined personal networks of both members of a couple, collected from 207 mixed-sex newlywed couples living in low-income neighborhoods of Harris County, TX. We conducted a pattern-centric analysis of compositional and structural features to identify distinct types of couple networks. We identified five qualitatively distinct network types (wife family-focused, husband family-focused, shared friends, wife friend-focused, and extremely disconnected). Couples' network types were associated with the quality of the relationships between couples and their network contacts (e.g., emotional support) but not with the quality of the couples' relationship with each other. We argue that duocentric networks provide appropriate data for measuring bonding and bridging capital in couple networks.

Indexed as

cluster analysiscognitive networkscouplesDuocentric networksmarriagepersonal networks

Identifiers

PMID38223900
PMCPMC10783164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.