Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38223876›Full record

ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2023

Accreditation of a molecular HIV diagnostic laboratory following the Strengthening Laboratory Management Towards Accreditation (SLMTA)-Stepwise Laboratory Quality Improvement Process Towards Accreditation (SLIPTA) approach in Kenya: an implementation science study.

Joy Mwende Ndunda, James Sitati, Mary Inziani, Rebecca Loraine Achieng, Janepher Achieng, Laurie Kennedy, Cynthia Kademba, Agnes Wanjiru, Videlis Nduba, Carolyne Ndila and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joy Mwende NdundaKenya Medical Research Institute, Mbagathi Road Off Mbagathi Way, Nairobi, Kenya.
James SitatiKenya Medical Research Institute, Mbagathi Road Off Mbagathi Way, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mary InzianiKenya Medical Research Institute, Mbagathi Road Off Mbagathi Way, Nairobi, Kenya.
Rebecca Loraine AchiengKenya Medical Research Institute, Mbagathi Road Off Mbagathi Way, Nairobi, Kenya.
Janepher AchiengKenya Medical Research Institute, Mbagathi Road Off Mbagathi Way, Nairobi, Kenya.
Laurie KennedyKenya Medical Research Institute, Mbagathi Road Off Mbagathi Way, Nairobi, Kenya.
Cynthia KadembaKenya Medical Research Institute, Mbagathi Road Off Mbagathi Way, Nairobi, Kenya.
Agnes WanjiruKenya Medical Research Institute, Mbagathi Road Off Mbagathi Way, Nairobi, Kenya.
Videlis NdubaKenya Medical Research Institute, Mbagathi Road Off Mbagathi Way, Nairobi, Kenya.
Carolyne NdilaKenya Medical Research Institute, Mbagathi Road Off Mbagathi Way, Nairobi, Kenya.
Matilu MwauKenya Medical Research Institute, Mbagathi Road Off Mbagathi Way, Nairobi, Kenya.
Kenya Medical Research Institute · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: accreditation is the most effective approach to ensure the quality of services. Laboratory performance can be evaluated using the World Health Organization (WHO)-SLIPTA checklist, which checks a laboratory´s compliance with ISO 15189 on a five-star score scale and improved using the SLMTA approach. Compliance is assessed by an external body and can result in accreditation. In this paper, we describe the steps taken by the Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) HIV Laboratory, Alupe, a resource-limited public entity, towards accreditation, and discuss the lessons learned. Methods: the laboratory adopted a SLMTA-SLIPTA approach that included targeted mentorship, on-site workshops, and training. Mentorship-based interventions were used to establish a robust quality management system. Targeted mentorship, on-site workshops, and training were conducted between September 2015 and July 2016. Audits used the SLIPTA checklist to detect gaps in 12 quality system essentials. Performance indicators including turnaround time, external quality assurance, sample rejection rates, and corrective actions were tracked. An external assessment by the national accreditation body was conducted between September 2016 and November 2016. Results: training and mentorship-based interventions were successfully conducted. Quality management systems aligned with ISO 15189 were established. Baseline, midterm, and exit audits yielded scores of 47%, 75%, and 94% respectively. Early infant diagnosis external quality assurance scores were 100% in 2014-2016, while average viral load scores were at 60%, 70% and 90% during the same period. Turnaround time from September 2015 surpassed the 80% target. Accreditation was awarded in March 2017. Conclusion: the SLMTA-SLIPTA approach is suitable for quality improvement in resource-limited laboratories.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsLaboratoriesAccreditationHumansImplementation ScienceKenyaQuality ControlQuality ImprovementaccreditationHIVmolecular laboratorySLIPTASLMTAViral load

Identifiers

PMID38223876
PMCPMC10787130
OpenAlexW4387716222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.