Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38223816›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024

The Prevalence and Severity of Acquired Blepharoptosis in US Eye Care Clinic Patients and Their Receptivity to Treatment.

Cynthia Matossian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cynthia MatossianMatossian Eye Associates, Doylestown, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4119-5230
Eye Care Associates · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the presence and severity of acquired blepharoptosis (ptosis) among patients visiting an eye care clinic and the receptivity of eligible patients to pharmacologic treatment with oxymetazoline 0.1% ophthalmic solution. Patients and Methods: Patients aged 50 years or older who had a scheduled clinic appointment for any reason (eg, dry eye, cataract surgery consultation) were asked to respond to written questions about lid position and select whether their upper lid position most closely matched one of 4 images shown to them corresponding to no, mild, moderate, or severe ptosis. Patients selecting any of the mild, moderate, or severe ptosis were offered treatment with oxymetazoline 0.1% ophthalmic solution, barring any medical contraindications. The outcome measures were the proportion of patients with each self-reported lid position level (none to severe ptosis), the proportion of patients with asymmetric ptosis, and the proportion of patients willing to accept the treatment. Results: Data for 188 eyes of 94 patients were analyzed. Overall, 73.4% of patients had ptosis in at least one eye, and 25.5% had an asymmetric upper eyelid presentation. The proportions of patients with self-reported mild, moderate, or severe ptosis in at least one eye were 41.5%, 25.5%, and 6.4%, respectively. Among those patients eligible for treatment, 19.7% were willing to accept the treatment. Conclusion: Based on patients' self-assessment of lid position, this study suggests a higher prevalence of ptosis than reported previously. Evaluation of the eyelids should be a standard part of the comprehensive eye examination.

Indexed as

blepharoptosislid positionoxymetazoline ophthalmic solutionptosisseverity of ptosis

Identifiers

PMID38223816
PMCPMC10788066
OpenAlexW4390742489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.