ArticleJournal of medical physics
Split X-jaw Planning Technique of Volumetric Modulated Arc Radiotherapy.
Article in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dosimetric Evaluation of Tangential Arc and Jaw Tracking Techniques in Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Synchronous Bilateral Breast Cancer.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This brief communication article examines the constraints posed by the Varian linear accelerator machine's volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) due to the maximum extent of the multileaf collimator (MLC) in the x-jaw direction. The MLC leaves within this machine are capable of extending up to 15 cm in the x-jaw direction. However, when VMAT is employed with excessive extension, modulation level decreases, leading to compromised target dose distribution, and the protection of critical organs. The existing VMAT techniques involve open and limited x-jaw approaches, but these methods present avenues for enhancement. One innovative approach is the split x-jaw planning technique, which involves segmenting the open field into two distinct fields with some overlap. This strategy yields four treatment arcs that comprehensively cover the planning target volume (PTV). Enhancing modulation and conformity can be achieved by restricting each field's size to 15 cm. Consequently, this technique demonstrates improved target dose distributions, heightened plan conformity, and more effective sparing of organs at risk compared to the limited and open methodologies. Initial dosimetric studies suggest that the split X-jaw technique holds promise as a superior planning solution for larger PTVs that exceed the MLC's maximum x-jaw extent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.