ArticlePeerJ2024
Biocontrol potential of endophytic bacterium
Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of Fermentation Broth from the Biocontrol FungusMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Biological Control and Growth-Promoting Potential of the Endophytic FungusJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Biocontrol of strawberry powdery mildew by Bacillus altitudinis DXHS: mechanistic insights from transcriptome analysis.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Biopriming with Endophytes improves plant resilience to develop climate-smart, futuristic agricultural crops.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Review
- Evaluating NativePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Biocontrol Activity ofMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- The Research of Antagonistic Endophytic BacteriumMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- The Laccase Family GenePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Combined transcriptomic and metabolomic analysis of the mechanism by whichFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Effects of microbial biocontrol agents on tea plantation microecology and tea plant metabolism: a review.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: As one of the main pathogens causing tea anthracnose disease, Methods: The antifungal mechanism of the endophytic bacterium GS-16 against Results: We investigated the possible mechanism of strain GS-16 inhibiting 1-F. Conclusions: We concluded that GS-16 could damage cell permeability and integrity, destroy the normal synthesis of cellular contents, and induce plant resistance, which contributed to its antagonistic activity. These findings indicated that strain GS-16 could be used as an efficient microorganism for tea anthracnose disease caused by
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.