ArticlePeerJ2024
A new perspective on the taxonomy and systematics of Arvicolinae (Gray, 1821) and a new time-calibrated phylogeny for the clade.
Article in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A highly contiguous genome assembly for the California vole, Microtus californicus, provides insight into phylogenetic relationships and patterns of synteny among voles.The Journal of heredity · 2026Article
- The Microtus fortis chromosome-level genome: illuminating adaptive evolution and natural parasite immunity.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- The evolutionary history of the field vole species complex revealed by modern and ancient genomes.Genome biology · 2026Article
- The complete mitochondrial genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Arvicoline rodents are one of the most speciose and rapidly evolving mammalian lineages. Fossil arvicolines are also among the most common vertebrate fossils found in sites of Pliocene and Pleistocene age in Eurasia and North America. However, there is no taxonomically robust, well-supported, time-calibrated phylogeny for the group. Methods: Here we present well-supported hypotheses of arvicoline rodent systematics using maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference of DNA sequences of two mitochondrial genes and three nuclear genes representing 146 (82% coverage) species and 100% of currently recognized arvicoline genera. We elucidate well-supported major clades, reviewed the relationships and taxonomy of many species and genera, and critically compared our resulting molecular phylogenetic hypotheses to previously published hypotheses. We also used five fossil calibrations to generate a time-calibrated phylogeny of Arvicolinae that permitted some reconciliation between paleontological and neontological data. Results: Our results are largely congruent with previous molecular phylogenies, but we increased the support in many regions of the arvicoline tree that were previously poorly-sampled. Our sampling resulted in a better understanding of relationships within Clethrionomyini, the early-diverging position and close relationship of true lemmings (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.