Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38223741›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

CT radiomics for predicting the prognosis of patients with stage II rectal cancer during the three-year period after surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Hanjing Zhang, Yu Deng, M A Xiaojie, Qian Zou, Huanhui Liu, Ni Tang, Yuanyuan Luo, Xuejing Xiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hanjing ZhangDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Chuanbei Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, 637000, China.
Yu DengThe Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, GuiYang, Guizhou Province, 550000, China.
M A XiaojieDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Chuanbei Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, 637000, China.
Qian ZouDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Chuanbei Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, 637000, China.
Huanhui LiuDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Chuanbei Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, 637000, China.
Ni TangDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Chuanbei Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, 637000, China.
Yuanyuan LuoDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Chuanbei Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, 637000, China.
Xuejing XiangDepartment of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Chuanbei Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan Province, 637000, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Pre-treatment enhanced CT image data were used to train and build models to predict the efficacy of non-small cell lung cancer after conventional radiotherapy and chemotherapy using two classification algorithms, Logistic Regression (LR) and Gaussian Naive Baye (GNB). Methods: In this study, we used pre-treatment enhanced CT image data for region of interest (ROI) sketching and feature extraction. We utilized the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) mutual confidence method for feature screening. We pre-screened logistic regression (LR) and Gaussian naive Bayes (GNB) classification algorithms and trained and modeled the screened features. We plotted 5-fold and 10-fold cross-validated receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to calculate the area under the curve (AUC). We performed DeLong's test for validation and plotted calibration curves and decision curves to assess model performance. Results: A total of 102 patients were included in this study, and after a comparative analysis of the two models, LR had only slightly lower specificity than GNB, and higher sensitivity, accuracy, AUC value, precision, and F1 value than GNB (training set accuracy: 0.787, AUC value: 0.851; test set accuracy: 0.772, AUC value: 0.849), and the LR model has better performance in both the decision curve and the calibration curve. Conclusion: CT can be used for efficacy prediction after radiotherapy and chemotherapy in NSCLC patients. LR is more suitable for predicting whether NSCLC prognosis is in remission without considering the computing speed.

Identifiers

PMID38223741
PMCPMC10787243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.