Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38223671›Full record

ArticleToxicological research2024

Re-evaluation of a microbiological acceptable daily intake for tylosin based on its impact on human intestinal microflora.

Min Ji Kim, Ji Young Kim, Jang Duck Choi, Guiim Moon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Min Ji KimPesticide and Veterinary Drug Residues Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, 187 Osongsaengmyeong 2-ro, Osong, Cheongju, Chungcheongbuk-do 28159 Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3952-033X
Ji Young KimPesticide and Veterinary Drug Residues Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, 187 Osongsaengmyeong 2-ro, Osong, Cheongju, Chungcheongbuk-do 28159 Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-6330-6731
Jang Duck ChoiPesticide and Veterinary Drug Residues Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, 187 Osongsaengmyeong 2-ro, Osong, Cheongju, Chungcheongbuk-do 28159 Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-8576-2754
Guiim MoonPesticide and Veterinary Drug Residues Division, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Ministry of Food and Drug Safety, 187 Osongsaengmyeong 2-ro, Osong, Cheongju, Chungcheongbuk-do 28159 Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3726-6748
Ministry of Food and Drug Safety · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As veterinary drugs available for fish is very restricted, there is growing trials for repurposing livestock drugs as aquatic animal drugs. Tylosin is one of the most effective antibiotics to treat bacterial infections approved for livestock, and would be used in fish. Hence, we investigated the toxicological and microbiological aspects of tylosin to establish health-based guidance value (HBGV) and maximum residue limit (MRL) in fishes, and reevaluated the microbiological acceptable daily intake (mADI) based on updated relevant data and international guildeline. Lastly, exposure assessment was performed to confirm the appropriateness of MRL. By investigating available microbiologcial studies on tylosin, the microbiological point of departure was determined as 0.308 μg/mL, which was mean 50% minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43188-023-00179-z.

Indexed as

FishesMicrobiological acceptable daily intakeRisk assessmentTylosin

Identifiers

PMID38223671
PMCPMC10786802
OpenAlexW4385497487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.