Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38223665›Full record

ReviewToxicological research2024

Efficiency of pharmaceutical toxicity prediction in computational toxicology.

Yoshihiro Uesawa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxicological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Coumarins fromOncoTargets and therapy · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Yoshihiro UesawaDepartment of Medical Molecular Informatics, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, 2-522-1 Noshio, Kiyose, Tokyo 204-8588 Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5773-991X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The adverse effects and toxicity of chemical substances pose substantial challenges in drug discovery and environmental science. Their management, most especially in the early development stage, is crucial in preventing costly failures in clinical trials. Predictive methodologies, such as computational toxicology, offer an effective means of managing risks, particularly for new compounds with insufficient post-marketing surveillance and those lacking information on adverse effects. Computational approaches have become increasingly important in environmental science, in which the sheer number and diversity of chemicals present similar challenges to toxicity control. Traditional animal-based evaluation methods are resource intensive, time consuming, and ethically problematic, making them unsuitable for use in assessing the vast compound range. It is an urgent task for the academic community to minimize the risks associated with drug discovery and environmental exposure. This study focuses on systems used to predict toxicity from chemical structure information and outlines the prediction accuracy and systems developed in Japan.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceIn silico studyMachine learningQSAR analysisToxicology

Identifiers

PMID38223665
PMCPMC10786748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.