SynthesisAfrican health sciences2023
Emricasan for the treatment of liver cirrhosis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in African health sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Primary, Secondary and Exploratory Endpoints in Phase 2 and 3 Clinical Trials with Novel Therapies in MASH Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Current Treatment Regimens and Promising Molecular Therapies for Chronic Hepatobiliary Diseases.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Editor's choice: Covid-19 and HIV are still very much with us.African health sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The efficacy of emricasan for liver cirrhosis remains controversial. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the influence of emricasan versus placebo on the treatment of liver cirrhosis. Methods: We have searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through August 2021 and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of emricasan versus placebo for liver cirrhosis. This meta-analysis was performed using the random-effect model. Results: Four RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with control group for liver cirrhosis, emricasan treatment had no substantial impact on MELD (SMD=-0.19; 95% CI=-0.44 to 0.06; P=0.14), INR (SMD=0.12; 95% CI=-0.13 to 0.37; P=0.36), total bilirubin (SMD=-0.27; 95% CI=-0.56 to 0.01; P=0.06), serum albumin (SMD=0; 95% CI=-0.25 to 0.25; P=1.00) or adverse events (OR=1.35; 95% CI=0.56 to 3.24; P=0.50). Conclusions: Emricasan treatment provided no benefit for the treatment of liver cirrhosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.