Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38223528›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences2022

Attenuation Coefficient Estimation for PET/MRI With Bayesian Deep Learning Pseudo-CT and Maximum-Likelihood Estimation of Activity and Attenuation.

Andrew P Leynes, Sangtae Ahn, Kristen A Wangerin, Sandeep S Kaushik, Florian Wiesinger, Thomas A Hope, Peder E Z Larson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andrew P LeynesDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0893-3350
Sangtae AhnBiology and Physics Department, GE Research, Niskayuna, NY 12309 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7252-2607
Kristen A WangerinPET/MR, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI 53188 USA.
Sandeep S KaushikMR Applications Science Laboratory Europe, GE Healthcare, 80807 Munich, Germany.
Florian WiesingerMR Applications Science Laboratory Europe, GE Healthcare, 80807 Munich, Germany.
Thomas A HopeDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2228-5823
Peder E Z LarsonDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4183-3634

Funding

Qualification and Harmonization of PET/MRI for Cancer Clinical TrialsR01CA212148 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HOPE, THOMAS, LAFOREST, RICHARD ANDRE · 2017 to 2022
$2.7M
Development of Sodium Fluoride PET-MRI for Quantitative Assessment of Knee OsteoarthritisR01AR074492 · NIAMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GOLD, GARRY E · 2019 to 2023
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA212148NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR074492
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A major remaining challenge for magnetic resonance-based attenuation correction methods (MRAC) is their susceptibility to sources of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artifacts (e.g., implants and motion) and uncertainties due to the limitations of MRI contrast (e.g., accurate bone delineation and density, and separation of air/bone). We propose using a Bayesian deep convolutional neural network that in addition to generating an initial pseudo-CT from MR data, it also produces uncertainty estimates of the pseudo-CT to quantify the limitations of the MR data. These outputs are combined with the maximum-likelihood estimation of activity and attenuation (MLAA) reconstruction that uses the PET emission data to improve the attenuation maps. With the proposed approach uncertainty estimation and pseudo-CT prior for robust MLAA (UpCT-MLAA), we demonstrate accurate estimation of PET uptake in pelvic lesions and show recovery of metal implants. In patients without implants, UpCT-MLAA had acceptable but slightly higher root-mean-squared-error (RMSE) than Zero-echotime and Dixon Deep pseudo-CT when compared to CTAC. In patients with metal implants, MLAA recovered the metal implant; however, anatomy outside the implant region was obscured by noise and crosstalk artifacts. Attenuation coefficients from the pseudo-CT from Dixon MRI were accurate in normal anatomy; however, the metal implant region was estimated to have attenuation coefficients of air. UpCT-MLAA estimated attenuation coefficients of metal implants alongside accurate anatomic depiction outside of implant regions.

Indexed as

Bayesian deep learningdeep learningmagnetic resonance-based attenuation correction (MRAC)maximum-likelihood estimation of activity and attenuation (MLAA)synthetic CT

Identifiers

PMID38223528
PMCPMC10785227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.