Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38223398›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2023

HIV policies in Australian prisons: a structured review assessing compliance with international guidelines.

Paul L Simpson, Bree Gardoll, Luella White, Tony Butler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paul L SimpsonSchool of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Bree GardollFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Luella WhiteFaculty of Law and Justice, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Tony ButlerSchool of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Globally, people living with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) are over-represented in incarcerated populations. The current study aimed to provide a national (Australian) snapshot of current HIV prison policies against the United Nations' (UN) 15 key HIV interventions for prisons. Publicly available policies, reports, and data were obtained, and interviews were conducted with prison health staff in five of eight Australian jurisdictions. We rated whether policies were compliant, partially compliant, or not compliant to the UN interventions and assigned an overall grade (A to E, where A = most compliant and E = least compliant) for each jurisdiction. Three jurisdictions received a B grade, three received a C grade, and two were not assessed due to insufficient data. In all jurisdictions HIV policies fell short of full compliance to most UN interventions. Prison-based needle and syringe programs and initiatives beyond education to reduce HIV transmission from body modification procedures (eg, tattooing) were absent in all jurisdictions. No condom programme existed in one jurisdiction and access issues were reported in others. Opioid substitution therapy, and peer-education access varied across and within most jurisdictions. Findings indicate that more action is required to meet the UN recommended interventions for HIV prevention in prisons.

Indexed as

CareHIVPolicyPreventionPrisonStandardsTestingTreatment

Identifiers

PMID38223398
PMCPMC10786648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.