ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2023
HIV policies in Australian prisons: a structured review assessing compliance with international guidelines.
Review in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Child and adolescent mental health burden, policies, and services in high-income countries and areas in the Western Pacific Region.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025Review
- A nurse-led satellite clinic initiative for STI testing in an Australian correctional center: a qualitative study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Globally, people living with the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) are over-represented in incarcerated populations. The current study aimed to provide a national (Australian) snapshot of current HIV prison policies against the United Nations' (UN) 15 key HIV interventions for prisons. Publicly available policies, reports, and data were obtained, and interviews were conducted with prison health staff in five of eight Australian jurisdictions. We rated whether policies were compliant, partially compliant, or not compliant to the UN interventions and assigned an overall grade (A to E, where A = most compliant and E = least compliant) for each jurisdiction. Three jurisdictions received a B grade, three received a C grade, and two were not assessed due to insufficient data. In all jurisdictions HIV policies fell short of full compliance to most UN interventions. Prison-based needle and syringe programs and initiatives beyond education to reduce HIV transmission from body modification procedures (eg, tattooing) were absent in all jurisdictions. No condom programme existed in one jurisdiction and access issues were reported in others. Opioid substitution therapy, and peer-education access varied across and within most jurisdictions. Findings indicate that more action is required to meet the UN recommended interventions for HIV prevention in prisons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.