ArticleBiomedical optics express2024
Deep learning-based size prediction for optical trapped nanoparticles and extracellular vesicles from limited bandwidth camera detection.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling the Electrochemical Synthesis of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles Using Artificial Neural Networks.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Harnessing artificial intelligence for engineering extracellular vesicles.Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids · 2025Review
- Biomedical Optics Express Feature Issue Introduction: Optical Manipulation and Its Applications (OMA) 2023.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Deep learning-based size prediction for optical trapped nanoparticles and extracellular vesicles from limited bandwidth camera detection.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to its ability to record position, intensity, and intensity distribution information, camera-based monitoring of nanoparticles in optical traps can enable multi-parametric morpho-optical characterization at the single-particle level. However, blurring due to the relatively long (10s of microsecond) integration times and aliasing from the resulting limited temporal bandwidth affect the detected particle position when considering nanoparticles in traps with strong stiffness, leading to inaccurate size predictions. Here, we propose a ResNet-based method for accurate size characterization of trapped nanoparticles, which is trained by considering only simulated time series data of nanoparticles' constrained Brownian motion. Experiments prove the method outperforms state-of-art sizing algorithms such as adjusted Lorentzian fitting or CNN-based networks on both standard nanoparticles and extracellular vesicles (EVs), as well as maintains good accuracy even when measurement times are relatively short (<1s per particle). On samples of clinical EVs, our network demonstrates a well-generalized ability to accurately determine the EV size distribution, as confirmed by comparison with gold-standard nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA). Furthermore, by combining the sizing network with still frame images from high-speed video, the camera-based optical tweezers have the unique capacity to quantify both the size and refractive index of bio-nanoparticles at the single-particle level. These experiments prove the proposed sizing network as an ideal path for predicting the morphological heterogeneity of bio-nanoparticles in optical potential trapping-related measurements.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.