ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Global trend in research of intracranial aneurysm management with artificial intelligence technology: a bibliometric analysis.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) technology has been growing in the management of intracranial aneurysms (IAs). This study aims to conduct a bibliometric analysis of researches on intracranial aneurysm management with artificial intelligence technology (IAMWAIT) to gain insights into global research trends and potential future directions. Methods: A comprehensive search of articles and reviews related to IAMWAIT, published from January 1, 1900 to July 20, 2023, was conducted using the Web of Science Core Collection (WoWCC).Visualizations of the bibliometric analysis were generated utilizing WPS Office, Scimago Graphica, VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and R. Results: A total of 277 papers were included in the study. China emerged as the most prolific country in terms of publications, institutions, cooperating countries, and prolific authors. The United States garnered the highest number of total citations, institutions with the highest citations/H index, cooperating countries (n=9), and 3 of the top 10 cited papers. Both the total number of papers and the citation count exhibited a positive and significant correlation with the gross domestic product (GDP) of countries. The journal with the highest publication frequency was Frontiers in Neurology, while Stroke recorded the highest number of citations, H-index, and impact factor (IF). Areas of primary interest in IAMWAIT, leveraging AI technology, included rupture risk assessment/prediction, computer-assisted diagnosis, outcome prediction, hemodynamics, and laboratory research of IAs. Conclusions: IAMWAIT is an active area of research that has undergone rapid development in recent years. Future endeavors should focus on broader application of AI algorithms in various sub-fields of IAMWAIT to better suit the real world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.