ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Comparison of the distribution of the Bartholin and/or Rivinus salivary ducts assessed with magnetic resonance-sialography in patients with ranula and in healthy subjects.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The distribution and drainage of the sublingual gland ducts have various patterns that might be related to sublingual gland-related diseases, including ranula. This study aimed to elucidate the characteristics of the distribution of Bartholin and/or Rivinus ducts in patients with ranula using magnetic resonance (MR) sialography. Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, the distributions and drainage patterns of sublingual gland ducts on MR sialography were classified in 74 subjects without sublingual gland-related disease as confirmed by both medical history and clinical examination and 15 patients with ranula, respectively. All patients had visited Kyushu Dental University Hospital from July 2015 to June 2022 to undergo MR imaging. Data on the distributions and drainage patterns of the sublingual gland ducts, including the characteristics of the Bartholin and/or Rivinus ducts, were then statistically compared between subjects without sublingual gland-related disease and patients with ranula. The images were assessed by an experienced oral and maxillofacial radiology specialist certified by the Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. The distributions (five groups) and drainage patterns (three patterns) of the sublingual gland ducts on MR sialography were classified in reference to previous studies, with some modifications in all subjects without sublingual gland-related disease and patients with ranula. Results: A significant difference in the distribution of the ducts (P<0.001), with a low number of patients exposing an undetected canal or Rivinius duct, was found in the group of patients with ranula (P<0.05). Regarding drainage patterns, no patient with ranula presented a Rivinius duct only. A significant difference in the drainage patterns of the sublingual gland ducts on MR sialography was observed between subjects without sublingual gland-related disease and patients with ranula (P=0.001). Conclusions: The present results suggest that the distribution of the sublingual gland ducts, mainly, the Bartholin duct, may be related to ranula formation. These findings also demonstrate that MR sialography contributes well to preoperative evaluation and is effective for assessing the complex excretory distribution of the sublingual gland ducts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.