Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38223078›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024

Artificial intelligence for segmentation and classification of lobar, lobular, and interstitial pneumonia using case-specific CT information.

Qiao Zhu, Peishuai Che, Meijiao Li, Wei Guo, Kai Ye, Wenyu Yin, Dongheng Chu, Xiaohua Wang, Shufang Li

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Qiao Zhu *Department of Radiology, the Third Hospital of Peking University, Beijing, China.
Peishuai Che *School of Information and Communication Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.
Meijiao LiDepartment of Radiology, the Third Hospital of Peking University, Beijing, China.
Wei GuoDepartment of Radiology, the Third Hospital of Peking University, Beijing, China.
Kai YeDepartment of Radiology, the Third Hospital of Peking University, Beijing, China.
Wenyu YinSchool of Information and Communication Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.
Dongheng ChuSchool of Information and Communication Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.
Xiaohua Wang *Department of Radiology, the Third Hospital of Peking University, Beijing, China.
Shufang Li *School of Information and Communication Engineering, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China.
Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications · CNPeking University · CNPeking University Third Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pneumonia can be anatomically classified into lobar, lobular, and interstitial types, with each type associated with different pathogens. Utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) to determine the anatomical classifications of pneumonia and assist in refining the differential diagnosis may offer a more viable and clinically relevant solution. This study aimed to develop a multi-classification model capable of identifying the occurrence of pneumonia in patients by utilizing case-specific computed tomography (CT) information, categorizing the pneumonia type (lobar, lobular, and interstitial pneumonia), and performing segmentation of the associated lesions. Methods: A total of 61 lobar pneumonia patients, 60 lobular pneumonia patients, and 60 interstitial pneumonia patients were consecutively enrolled at our local hospital from June 2020 and May 2022. All selected cases were divided into a training cohort (n=135) and an independent testing cohort (n=46). To generate the ground truth labels for the training process, manual segmentation and labeling were performed by three junior radiologists. Subsequently, the segmentations were manually reviewed and edited by a senior radiologist. AI models were developed to automatically segment the infected lung regions and classify the pneumonia. The accuracy of pneumonia lesion segmentation was analyzed and evaluated using the Dice coefficient. Receiver operating characteristic curves were plotted, and the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated to assess the efficacy of pneumonia classification. Results: Our AI model achieved a Dice coefficient of 0.743 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.657-0.826] for lesion segmentation in the training set and 0.723 (95% CI: 0.602-0.845) in the test set. In the test set, our model achieved an accuracy of 0.927 (95% CI: 0.876-0.978), precision of 0.889 (95% CI: 0.827-0.951), sensitivity of 0.889 (95% CI: 0.827-0.951), specificity of 0.946 (95% CI: 0.902-0.990), and AUC of 0.989 (95% CI: 0.969-1.000) for pneumonia classification. We trained the model using labels annotated by senior physicians and compared it to a model trained using labels annotated by junior physicians. The Dice coefficient of the model's segmentation improved by 0.014, increasing from 0.709 (95% CI: 0.589-0.830) to 0.723 (95% CI: 0.602-0.845), and the AUC improved by 0.042, rising from 0.947 to 0.989. Conclusions: Our study presents a robust multi-task learning model with substantial promise in enhancing the segmentation and classification of pneumonia in medical imaging.

Indexed as

artificial intelligence (AI)computed tomography (CT)image segmentationPneumoniaX-ray

Identifiers

PMID38223078
PMCPMC10784088
OpenAlexW4390428481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.