Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38223058›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024

Flow-augmentation STA-MCA bypass for acute and subacute ischemic stroke due to internal carotid artery occlusion and the role of advanced neuroimaging with hemodynamic and flow-measurement in the decision-making: preliminary data.

Martina Sebök, Lara Maria Höbner, Jorn Fierstra, Tilman Schubert, Susanne Wegener, Zsolt Kulcsár, Andreas R Luft, Luca Regli, Giuseppe Esposito

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martina SebökDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Lara Maria HöbnerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jorn FierstraDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Tilman SchubertClinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Susanne WegenerClinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Zsolt KulcsárClinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Andreas R LuftClinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Luca RegliDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Giuseppe EspositoDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
University Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A major clinical challenge is the adequate identification of patients with acute (<1 week) and subacute (1-6 weeks) ischemic stroke due to internal carotid artery (ICA) occlusion who could benefit from a surgical revascularization after a failure of endovascular and/or medical treatment. Recently, two novel quantitative imaging modalities have been introduced: (I) quantitative magnetic resonance angiography (qMRA) with non-invasive optimal vessel analysis (NOVA) for quantification of blood flow in major cerebral arteries (in mL/min), and (II) blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR). The aim of this study is to present our cohort of patients who underwent surgical revascularization in the acute and subacute phase of ischemic stroke as well as to demonstrate the importance of hemodynamic and flow assessment for the decision-making regarding surgical revascularization in patients with acute and subacute stroke and ICA-occlusion. Methods: Symptomatic patients with acute and subacute ischemic stroke because of persistent ICA-occlusion despite optimal medical/endovascular recanalization therapy who were treated at the Neuroscience Clinical Center of the University Hospital Zurich underwent both BOLD-CVR and qMRA-NOVA to study the hemodynamic and collateral vessel status. Patients selected for surgical revascularization according to our previously published flowchart were included in this prospective cohort study. Repeated NOVA and BOLD-CVR investigations were done after bypass surgery as follow up as well as clinical follow up. Continuous BOLD-CVR and qMRA-NOVA variables were compared using paired Student Results: Between May 2019 and September 2022, superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) bypass surgery was performed in 12 patients with acute and subacute stroke because of ICA-occlusion despite of optimal endovascular and/or medical treatment prior to the surgery. Impaired BOLD-CVR in the occluded vascular territory [MCA territory: ipsilateral Conclusions: Quantitative assessment with BOLD-CVR and qMRA-NOVA allows us to evaluate the pre- and post-operative cerebral hemodynamics and collateral vessel status in patients with acute/subacute stroke due to ICA occlusion who may benefit from surgical revascularization after failure of endovascular/medical treatment.

Indexed as

hemodynamicsinternal carotid artery occlusion (ICA occlusion)Ischemic strokequantitative flowsuperficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery bypass (STA-MCA bypass)

Identifiers

PMID38223058
PMCPMC10784084
OpenAlexW4390428623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.