ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
Brain connectome-based imaging markers for identifiable signature of migraine with and without aura.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- 'Man vs. Machine: can ML algorithms diagnose headaches as accurately as clinicians? A systematic review.'Journal of neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Migraine with and without aura-two distinct entities? A narrative review.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Review
- Cerebral morphometric alterations predict the outcome of migraine diagnosis and subtyping: a radiomics analysis.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Disrupted topological organization of brain connectome in patients with chronic low back related leg pain and clinical correlations.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Disrupted topologic efficiency of white matter structural connectome in migraine: a graph-based connectomics study.The journal of headache and pain · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cortical spreading depression (CSD) has been considered the prominent theory for migraine with aura (MwA). However, it is also argued that CSD can exist in patients in a silent state, and not manifest as aura. Thus, the MwA classification based on aura may be questionable. This study aimed to capture whole-brain connectome-based imaging markers with identifiable signatures for MwA and migraine without aura (MwoA). Methods: A total of 88 migraine patients (32 MwA) and 49 healthy controls (HC) underwent a diffusion tensor imaging and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging scan. The whole-brain structural connectivity (SC) and functional connectivity (FC) analysis was employed to extract imaging features. The extracted features were subjected to an all-relevant feature selection process within cross-validation loops to pinpoint attributes demonstrating substantial efficacy for patient categorization. Based on the identified features, the predictive ability of the random forest classifiers constructed with the 88 migraine patients' sample was tested using an independent sample of 32 migraine patients (eight MwA). Results: Compared to MwoA and HC, MwA showed two reduced SC and six FC (five increased and one reduced) features [all P<0.01, after false discovery rate (FDR) correction], involving frontal areas, temporal areas, visual areas, amygdala, and thalamus. A total of four imaging features were significantly correlated with clinical rating scales in all patients (r=-0.38 to 0.47, P<0.01, after FDR correction). The predictive ability of the random forest classifiers achieved an accuracy of 78.1% in the external sample to identify MwA. Conclusions: The whole-brain connectivity features in our results may serve as connectome-based imaging markers for MwA identification. The alterations of SC and FC strength provide possible evidence in further understanding the heterogeneity and mechanism of MwA which may help for patient-specific decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.