ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
2.5D transfer deep learning model for segmentation of contrast-enhancing lesions on brain magnetic resonance imaging of multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Super-resolution MRI and 2.5D deep learning for intratumoral-peritumoral radiomics in preoperative prediction of rectal cancer perineural invasion.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Development of a hybrid 2.5D deep learning model for glioma survival prediction using T1-weighted MRI from the CGGA database.European journal of radiology open · 2025Article
- Current imaging applications, radiomics, and machine learning modalities of CNS demyelinating disorders and its mimickers.Journal of neurology · 2025Review
- Deep Learning with Transfer Learning on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A Radiomics-Based Model for Predicting Breast Cancer Risk.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The value of predicting breast cancer with a DBT 2.5D deep learning model.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence algorithm was used to establish and verify the prediction model of portal hypertension in hepatocellular carcinoma based on clinical parameters and imaging features.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Precise diagnosis of pediatric posterior cranial fossa neoplasms based on 2.5D MRI deep learning.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Exploring Multi-Pathology Brain Segmentation: From Volume-Based to Component-Based Deep Learning Analysis.Journal of imaging · 2024Article
- Application of multimodal deep learning and multi-instance learning fusion techniques in predicting STN-DBS outcomes for Parkinson's disease patients.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2024Article
- Contrast-Enhancing Lesion Segmentation in Multiple Sclerosis: A Deep Learning Approach Validated in a Multicentric Cohort.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) are the two mimic autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system, which are rare in East Asia. Quantitative detection of contrast-enhancing lesions (CELs) on contrast-enhancing T1-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images is of great significance for assessing the disease activity of MS and NMOSD. However, it is challenging to develop automatic segmentation algorithms due to the lack of data. In this work, we present an automatic segmentation model of CELs based on Fully Convolutional with Attention DenseNet (FCA-DenseNet) and transfer learning strategy to address the challenge of CEL quantification in small-scale datasets. Methods: A transfer learning approach was employed in this study, whereby pretraining was conducted using 77 MS subjects from the open access datasets (MICCAI 2016, MICCAI 2017, ISBI 2015) for white matter hyperintensity segmentation, followed by fine-tuning using 24 MS and NMOSD subjects from the local dataset for CEL segmentation. The proposed FCA-DenseNet combined the Fully Convolutional DenseNet and Convolutional Block Attention Module in order to improve the learning capability. A 2.5D data slicing strategy was used to process complex 3D MR images. U-Net, ResUNet, TransUNet, and Attention-UNet are used as comparison models to FCA-DenseNet. Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), positive predictive value (PPV), true positive rate (TPR), and volume difference (VD) are used as evaluation metrics to evaluate the performances of different models. Results: FCA-DenseNet outperforms all other models in terms of all evaluation metrics, with a DSC of 0.661±0.187, PPV of 0.719±0.201, TPR of 0.680±0.254, and VD of 0.388±0.334. Transfer learning strategy has achieved success in building segmentation models on a small-scale local dataset where traditional deep learning approaches fail to train effectively. Conclusions: The improved FCA-DenseNet, combined with transfer learning strategy and 2.5D data slicing strategy, has successfully addressed the challenges in constructing deep learning models on small-scale datasets, making it conducive to clinical quantification of brain CELs and diagnosis of MS and NMOSD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.