ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024
A difficulty-aware and task-augmentation method based on meta-learning model for few-shot diabetic retinopathy classification.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Macular hole detection and segmentation on fundus photography using large multimodal generative models for synthetic augmentation.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- The role of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy through retinal lesion features: a narrative review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Review
- Enhancing automatic prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer with deep transfer learning 2.5-dimensional segmentation on bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (bp-MRI).Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- FedDL: personalized federated deep learning for enhanced detection and classification of diabetic retinopathy.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- A unified VQ-VAE framework for few-shot retinal vessel segmentation and multidisease classification.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate classification techniques are essential for the early diagnosis and treatment of patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR). However, the limited amount of annotated DR data poses a challenge for existing deep-learning models. This article proposes a difficulty-aware and task-augmentation method based on meta-learning (DaTa-ML) model for few-shot DR classification with fundus images. Methods: The difficulty-aware (Da) method operates by dynamically modifying the cross-entropy loss function applied to learning tasks. This methodology has the ability to intelligently down-weight simpler tasks, while simultaneously prioritizing more challenging tasks. These adjustments occur automatically and aim to optimize the learning process. Additionally, the task-augmentation (Ta) method is used to enhance the meta-training process by augmenting the number of tasks through image rotation and improving the feature-extraction capability. To implement the expansion of the meta-training tasks, various task instances can be sampled during the meta-training stage. Ultimately, the proposed Ta method was introduced to optimize the initialization parameters and enhance the meta-generalization performance of the model. The DaTa-ML model showed promising results by effectively addressing the challenges associated with few-shot DR classification. Results: The Asia Pacific Tele-Ophthalmology Society (APTOS) 2019 blindness detection data set was used to evaluate the DaTa-ML model. The results showed that with only 1% of the training data (5-way, 20-shot) and a single update step (training time reduced by 90%), the DaTa-ML model had an accuracy rate of 89.6% on the test data, which is a 1.7% improvement over the transfer-learning method [i.e., residual neural network (ResNet)50 pre-trained on ImageNet], and a 16.8% improvement over scratch-built models (i.e., ResNet50 without pre-trained weights), despite having fewer trainable parameters (the parameters used by the DaTa-ML model are only 0.47% of the ResNet50 parameters). Conclusions: The DaTa-ML model provides a more efficient DR classification solution with little annotated data and has significant advantages over state-of-the-art methods. Thus, it could be used to guide and assist ophthalmologists to determine the severity of DR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.