Impact of deep learning-based reconstruction and anti-peristaltic agent on the image quality and diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance enterography comparing single breath-hold single-shot fast spin echo with and without anti-peristaltic agent.

Background: While anti-peristaltic agents are beneficial for high quality magnetic resonance enterography (MRE), their use is constrained by potential side effects and increased examination complexity. We explored the potential of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) to compensate for the absence of anti-peristaltic agent, improve image quality and reduce artifact. This study aimed to evaluate the need for an anti-peristaltic agent in single breath-hold single-shot fast spin-echo (SSFSE) MRE and compare the image quality and artifacts between conventional reconstruction (CR) and DLR. Methods: We included 45 patients who underwent MRE for Crohn's disease between October 2021 and September 2022. Coronal SSFSE images without fat saturation were acquired before and after anti-peristaltic agent administration. Four sets of data were generated: SSFSE CR with and without an anti-peristaltic agent (CR-A and CR-NA, respectively) and SSFSE DLR with and without an anti-peristaltic agent (DLR-A and DLR-NA, respectively). Two radiologists independently reviewed the images for overall quality and artifacts, and compared the three images with DLR-A. The degree of distension and inflammatory parameters were scored on a 5-point scale in the jejunum and ileum, respectively. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) levels were calculated in superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and iliac bifurcation level. Results: In terms of overall quality, DLR-NA demonstrated no significant difference compared to DLR-A, whereas CR-NA and CR-A demonstrated significant differences (P<0.05, both readers). Regarding overall artifacts, reader 1 rated DLR-A slightly better than DLR-NA in four cases and rated them as identical in 41 cases (P=0.046), whereas reader 2 demonstrated no difference. Bowel distension was significantly different in the jejunum (Reader 1: P=0.046; Reader 2: P=0.008) but not in the ileum. Agreements between the images (Reader 1: ĸ=0.73-1.00; Reader 2: ĸ=1.00) and readers (ĸ=0.66 for all comparisons) on inflammation were considered good to excellent. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in diagnosing inflammation in the terminal ileum were the same among DLR-NA, DLR-A, CR-NA and CR-A (94.42%, 81.83%, and 89.69 %; and 83.33%, 90.91%, and 86.21% for Readers 1 and 2, respectively). In both SMA and iliac bifurcation levels, SNR of DLR images exhibited no significant differences. CR images showed significantly lower SNR compared with DLR images (P<0.001). Conclusions: SSFSE without anti-peristaltic agents demonstrated nearly equivalent quality to that with anti-peristaltic agents. Omitting anti-peristaltic agents before SSFSE and adding DLR could improve the scanning outcomes and reduce time.