Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38223035›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2024

Transferring U-Net between low-dose CT denoising tasks: a validation study with varied spatial resolutions.

Xin Zhang, Ting Su, Yunxin Zhang, Han Cui, Yuhang Tan, Jiongtao Zhu, Dongmei Xia, Hairong Zheng, Dong Liang, Yongshuai Ge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xin ZhangResearch Center for Medical Artificial Intelligence, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Ting SuResearch Center for Medical Artificial Intelligence, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Yunxin ZhangDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Han CuiResearch Center for Medical Artificial Intelligence, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Yuhang TanResearch Center for Medical Artificial Intelligence, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Jiongtao ZhuCollege of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Dongmei XiaKey Laboratory of Low-grade Energy Utilization Technologies and Systems of Ministry of Education of China, College of Power Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China.
Hairong ZhengPaul C Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Dong LiangResearch Center for Medical Artificial Intelligence, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Yongshuai GeResearch Center for Medical Artificial Intelligence, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recently, deep learning techniques have been widely used in low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) imaging applications for quickly generating high quality computed tomography (CT) images at lower radiation dose levels. The purpose of this study is to validate the reproducibility of the denoising performance of a given network that has been trained in advance across varied LDCT image datasets that are acquired from different imaging systems with different spatial resolutions. Methods: Specifically, LDCT images with comparable noise levels but having different spatial resolutions were prepared to train the U-Net. The number of CT images used for the network training, validation and test was 2,400, 300 and 300, respectively. Afterwards, self- and cross-validations among six selected spatial resolutions (62.5, 125, 250, 375, 500, 625 µm) were studied and compared side by side. The residual variance, peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR), normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) and structural similarity (SSIM) were measured and compared. In addition, network retraining on a small number of image set was performed to fine tune the performance of transfer learning among LDCT tasks with varied spatial resolutions. Results: Results demonstrated that the U-Net trained upon LDCT images having a certain spatial resolution can effectively reduce the noise of the other LDCT images having different spatial resolutions. Regardless, results showed that image artifacts would be generated during the above cross validations. For instance, noticeable residual artifacts were presented at the margin and central areas of the object as the resolution inconsistency increased. The retraining results showed that the artifacts caused by the resolution mismatch can be greatly reduced by utilizing about only 20% of the original training data size. This quantitative improvement led to a reduction in the NRMSE from 0.1898 to 0.1263 and an increase in the SSIM from 0.7558 to 0.8036. Conclusions: In conclusion, artifacts would be generated when transferring the U-Net to a LDCT denoising task with different spatial resolution. To maintain the denoising performance, it is recommended to retrain the U-Net with a small amount of datasets having the same target spatial resolution.

Indexed as

computed tomography (CT) denoisingLow-dose computed tomography (LDCT)network retrainingspatial resolutionU-Net

Identifiers

PMID38223035
PMCPMC10784075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.