ArticleIndian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB2024
The 'Insertion/Deletion' Polymorphism, rs4340 and Diabetes Risk: A Pilot Study from a Hospital Cohort.
Article in Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The insertion/deletion, I/D polymorphism, in the gene encoding Angiotensin Converting Enzyme, ACE is a popular genetic marker for cardiovascular disease, CVD. With alarming rise in diabetes, the risk of CVD among Indian subjects is further enhanced. The present study explored the role of ACE I/D polymorphism, rs4340 as a genetic marker and its association with diabetes. Genomic DNA, isolated from a cohort of 410 urban subjects attending our hospital, was genotyped using polymerase chain reaction followed by electrophoresis. Among the subjects, 84 had type-2 diabetes and 68 had hypertension while 258 were free from these risk factors. Majority (57/84) of diabetic subjects were also suffering from hypertension. Genotype frequencies of ACE I/D polymorphism, of diabetic (84) patients were not different from that of non-diabetic subjects (258). In sharp contrast, we found significant differences, in genotype frequencies of women with diabetes (n = 38) compared to non-diabetic women (70). Diabetic women had significantly higher prevalence of the high risk 'D' allele. Analysis of odds ratio, OR revealed that women with 'D/D' genotype, exhibited threefold risk (OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.21-8.05; p = 0.018) of diabetes, in the recessive model (D/D vs I/I + I/D). Further when we analysed Odds ratio of diabetic women (8) who were free from hypertension, the results revealed even a greater, 6- fold (OR 6.0, 95% CI 1.29-27.96, p = 0.027) risk of diabetes for D/D homozygous women (D/D vs I/I + I/D). These results suggest 'sex-specific' association of ACE 'I/D' polymorphism, with type-2 diabetes, affecting women while there was no influence observed among men. In view of the increased cardiovascular mortality among Indians, data from our pilot study if confirmed in a larger cohort, could add value to our future intervention efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.