ArticleCureus2024
Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients With Acute Schizophrenia.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The combined discriminative value of LHR, NLR, and platelet count in distinguishing first-episode schizophrenia.Annals of general psychiatry · 2026Article
- Article
- Evaluation of Inflammatory Markers in Perception Disorders in Major Psychiatric Pathology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Potential Biomarker for Schizophrenia Severity: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- Diagnosing schizophrenia with routine blood tests: a comparative analysis of machine learning algorithms.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Inflammatory Hematological Ratios in Adolescents with Mental Disorders: A Scoping Review.Consortium psychiatricum · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Schizophrenia symptom severity is linked to neuroinflammation. Certain blood cell indexes such as neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and neutrophil-albumin ratio (NAR) have been used as biomarkers in various diseases, including schizophrenia. In acute clinical practice, it is challenging to decide whether to provide intravenous antipsychotic treatment in some cases due to the lack of objective biomarkers of psychiatric symptoms. The NLR of individuals with schizophrenia is thought to be associated with disease severity, and changes in NLR may reflect a patient's response to antipsychotic treatment. We investigated the application of NLR as a biomarker for identifying acute severity and determining acute treatment response in patients with schizophrenia. Methods We retrospectively examined 251 inpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia and classified them according to treatment (intravenous haloperidol vs. oral antipsychotic medication during the acute phase) and investigated their NLR and NAR while receiving inpatient care. Results A total of 48 inpatients were given intravenous haloperidol to manage their acute symptoms; 208 were given oral antipsychotics. The intravenous haloperidol group experienced more severe symptoms, such as agitation and disorganized thinking, during the acute phase. Further, those who received intravenous haloperidol had significantly higher Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) scores than the oral antipsychotic group. NLR and NAR were also significantly higher in the haloperidol intravenous group. Conclusion Elevated NLR and NAR could be easily measured in patients with psychomotor agitation who should be treated at any facility. Further, they are useful biomarkers for determining disease severity and the effects of treatment on psychomotor excitement in patients who require intravenous haloperidol.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.