ArticleCureus2024
Initial Experience With 6D Skull Tracking and Intrafractional Motion Monitoring in the United Arab Emirates' First CyberKnife® Radiosurgery Center.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Six- and Three-Dimensional Error Corrections for the Planning Target Volume in Patients With Nasopharyngeal Cancer.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The introduction of the CyberKnife® system has marked a significant advancement in the field of radiosurgery, offering unparalleled precision in targeting and treating cranial and extracranial lesions. This paper details the first experience from the United Arab Emirates in implementing 6D skull tracking and intrafractional motion monitoring in CyberKnife® radiosurgery. The study aims to evaluate the system's efficacy in tracking and adjusting patient movement during treatment, enhancing treatment accuracy and patient safety. Methods and materials This retrospective study analyzed 732 images from six patients treated at the UAE's first CyberKnife® center. Patients were divided into two groups based on their treatment regimens: Patients 1 to 4 (P1 to P4) received multifractionated stereotactic radiotherapy, while Patients 5 and 6 (P5 and P6) underwent single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The movements recorded included supero-inferior, lateral, antero-posterior, roll, pitch, and yaw. Statistical tools were employed to interpret the data, including heat maps, box-and-whisker plots, and correlation analysis. Results The study's results indicate varied patterns of intrafractional movement across the different axes and between the two treatment groups. Multifractionated therapy patients exhibited a specific range and frequency of movements compared to those undergoing single-fraction treatment. The most significant movements were observed in the supero-inferior and lateral axes. Discussion The findings suggest that the CyberKnife® system's real-time tracking and adaptive capabilities are crucial in managing patient movements, especially in prolonged treatment sessions. The differences in movement patterns between multifractionated and single-fraction treatments underscore the need for tailored approaches in intrafractional motion monitoring. Conclusion The initial experience of the UAE's first CyberKnife® center demonstrates the system's effectiveness in addressing intrafractional movements, enhancing the precision and safety of radiosurgery treatments. This study contributes valuable insights into optimizing treatment protocols and underscores the importance of continuous monitoring and adaptive strategies in advanced radiosurgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.