ArticleEuroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterology
Detection of Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma on
Article in Euroasian journal of hepato-gastroenterology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims and background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), ranks as the third most prevalent malignancy contributing to cancer-related death on a global scale. Hepatocellular carcinoma is known to be the fifth most frequently diagnosed malignancy of the males while among females, it is ranked as the seventh most common malignancy. The study was conducted to detect the sensitivity of primary HCC using Materials and methods: This prospective study was conducted to identify the primary HCC in a sample size of 51 patients, in whom FDG PET-CT scan was performed between May 2022 and December 2022. Results: Among the cohort of 51 patients, primary HCC was detected on FDG PET-CT in 43 individuals representing true-positive cases. Conversely, FDG PET-CT was unable to detect HCC in 8 cases, representing false-negative. Out of 51 patients, 74.5% of HCC cases exhibited multifocal pattern. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max) of the primary malignant site ranged from 1.9 to 16.1, with a mean of 3.7 ± 2.8. The FDG PET-CT revealed abnormal sites of the uptake outside liver in 23 individuals. The research confirmed the tumor recurrence in four previously treated patients. In the conducted investigation, FDG PET-CT showed 84.3% sensitivity for the diagnosis of HCC. Conclusion: The study demonstrates that FDG PET-CT is a viable option for the detection of HCC. The sensitivity of FDG PET-CT in our population is comparable and in agreement with international data for diagnosis of HCC thereby favoring its reproducibility among geographical and ethnic groups. However, owing to the reduced ability of FDG PET-CT scan to identify well-differentiated/low-grade HCC, the routine use of FDG PET-CT scan may not be considered in cases requiring evaluation of primary disease only. How to cite this article: Arshad K, Hanan SD, Younis MN,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.