Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38222796›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2024

Application of Multidimensional Quality Management Tools in the Management of Medical Adverse Events.

Bei Yuan, Shibei Song, Xiao Tang, Zhanqiang Ma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bei YuanMedical Department, The Second People's Hospital of Guizhou Province (Guizhou Province Mental Health Center), Guizhou, Guiyang, 550001, People's Republic of China.
Shibei SongMedical Department, The Second People's Hospital of Guizhou Province (Guizhou Province Mental Health Center), Guizhou, Guiyang, 550001, People's Republic of China.
Xiao TangMedical Department, The Second People's Hospital of Guizhou Province (Guizhou Province Mental Health Center), Guizhou, Guiyang, 550001, People's Republic of China.
Zhanqiang MaMedical Department, The Second People's Hospital of Guizhou Province (Guizhou Province Mental Health Center), Guizhou, Guiyang, 550001, People's Republic of China.
Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the impact of multidimensional quality management tools in establishing a medical adverse event management system, with the aim of continuously improving medical quality and safety while ensuring patient well-being. Methods: This study introduces risk management theories, such as the "Gray Rhino Theory", and employs quality management tools like the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle, Quality Control Circle (QCC), and Root Cause Analysis (RCA), to provide relevant quality management education and training to employees. This approach facilitates the establishment of a medical adverse event management system that encourages reporting and fosters a blame-free reporting culture, while simultaneously implementing quality management across the entire process. The regular utilization of the QCC facilitates ongoing quality improvement. Furthermore, for sentinel events and patient harm incidents with educational values, the study employs the Incident Decision Tree (IDT) to determine appropriate actions. Additionally, the hospital initiates RCA for system-wide improvements, focusing on areas such as management, institutional processes, and environmental aspects. Moreover, an internal medical quality improvement case competition is organized, with outstanding cases being selected to participate in the multidimensional quality management competition organized by the National Quality Management Alliance. Results: The study reveals a significant improvement in employees' awareness of adverse events, the percentage of employees reporting adverse events increased significantly from 39.15% in 2019 to 49.77% in 2022, P=0.002. Furthermore, the adverse event reporting rate has risen significantly from 2.78% (2019) to 5.96% (2022), P=0.002. Additionally, each department has been able to utilize QCC or RCA tools for quality improvement, thereby further reinforcing the development of a patient safety culture. Conclusion: Multidimensional quality management tools play a crucial role in establishing a hospital's adverse event management system, promoting continuous improvement in medical quality, ensuring patient safety, and effectively implementing a culture of patient safety.

Indexed as

adverse eventsmanagement systemmultidimensional quality management toolspatient safety

Identifiers

PMID38222796
PMCPMC10787512
OpenAlexW4390684935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.