ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2024
Therapeutic anticoagulation in patients with acute pancreatitis and splanchnic vein thrombosis: a best evidence topic.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- AEG-AESPANC-OPGE-SIED-SPG Ibero-Latin American Guidelines on Acute Pancreatitis (iLATAM-AP).United European gastroenterology journal · 2026Guideline
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A best evidence topic in general surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The clinical question addressed was: in adult patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis in acute pancreatitis, would administration of therapeutic anticoagulation be advisable considering the rates of vessel recanalization and bleeding complications? Four hundred twenty-four papers were found on Ovid Embase and Medline whilst 222 were found on PubMed using the reported literature search. From these, five articles represented the best evidence to the clinical question. The authors, publication dates, countries, patient groups, study outcomes, and results of these papers were tabulated. There were three systematic reviews with meta-analyses, one systematic review without meta-analysis and one randomized, retrospective study. The authors conclude that among patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis in the context of acute pancreatitis, therapeutic anticoagulation improved the rates of recanalization without increasing the risk of bleeding complications. However, there remains a need for randomized studies to address this clinical dilemma to further increase the quality of available evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.