Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38222575›Full record

ArticleACS omega2024

Machine Learning Approaches: Detecting the Disease Variants in Human-Exhaled Breath Biomarkers.

Bhuvaneswari Selvaraj, Elakkiya Rajasekar, John Bosco Balaguru Rayappan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. MountPat: investigations on the EEG signals.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bhuvaneswari SelvarajCentre for Nanotechnology & Advanced Biomaterials (CeNTAB), SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu 613 401, India.
Elakkiya RajasekarDepartment of Computer Science, Birla Institute of Technology & Science, Pilani Dubai Campus, Dubai International Academic City, Dubai 345055, United Arab Emirates.
John Bosco Balaguru RayappanCentre for Nanotechnology & Advanced Biomaterials (CeNTAB), SASTRA Deemed University, Thanjavur, Tamil Nadu 613 401, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4641-9870

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent days, the development of sensor-based medical devices has been found to be very effective for the prediction and analysis of the onset of diseases. The instigation of an electronic nose (eNose) device is profound and very useful in diverse applications. The analysis of exhaled breath biomarkers using eNose sensors has attained wider attention among researchers, and the prediction of multiple disease variants using the same is still an open research problem. In this work, an enhanced XGBooster classifier-based prediction mechanism was introduced to identify the disease variants based on the responses of commercially available metal oxide-based Figaro (Japan) sensors including TGS826, TGS822, TGS2600, and TGS2602. The implemented model secured 98.36% prediction accuracy in multiclass disease prediction and classification. The homemade one-dimensional metal oxide sensing elements such as ZnO, Cr-doped ZnO, and ZnO/NiO were integrated with the aforementioned sensor array for the specific detection of the three biomarkers of interest. This model has attained a classification accuracy of 99.77, 94.91, and 96.56% toward ammonia, ethanol, and acetone, respectively. And the multiclass disease biomarker classification accuracy of the readymade and homemade eNose prototype models was compared, and the results are summarized.

Identifiers

PMID38222575
PMCPMC10785631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.