ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2023
Towards Understanding the Generalization of Medical Text-to-SQL Models and Datasets.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health Care Analytics Challenges: A 3-Pillar Framework Connecting Analytics Maturity, Workforce Agility, and Technical Enablement.Interactive journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Question Answering for Electronic Health Records: Scoping Review of Datasets and Models.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Automated Matchmaking of Researcher Biosketches and Funder Requests for Proposals Using Deep Neural Networks.IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electronic medical records (EMRs) are stored in relational databases. It can be challenging to access the required information if the user is unfamiliar with the database schema or general database fundamentals. Hence, researchers have explored text-to-SQL generation methods that provide healthcare professionals direct access to EMR data without needing a database expert. However, currently available datasets have been essentially "solved" with state-of-the-art models achieving accuracy greater than or near 90%. In this paper, we show that there is still a long way to go before solving text-to-SQL generation in the medical domain. To show this, we create new splits of the existing medical text-to- SQL dataset MIMICSQL that better measure the generalizability of the resulting models. We evaluate state-of-the-art language models on our new split showing substantial drops in performance with accuracy dropping from up to 92% to 28%, thus showing substantial room for improvement. Moreover, we introduce a novel data augmentation approach to improve the generalizability of the language models. Overall, this paper is the first step towards developing more robust text-to-SQL models in the medical domain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38222436PMC10785918What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.