ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2023
Experiences and Perceptions of Distinct Telehealth Delivery Models for Remote Patient Monitoring among Older Adults in the Community.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of telehealth modalities on medication adherence in older adults with heart disease: Evidence from NHATS.Internet interventions · 2026Article
- CardioAI: A Multimodal AI-based System to Support Symptom Monitoring and Risk Prediction of Cancer Treatment-Induced Cardiotoxicity.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2025Article
- Impact of telehealth on health outcomes and quality of life in the older adults population: a systematic review.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Three major telehealth delivery models-home-based, community-based, and telephone-based-have been adopted to enable remote patient monitoring of older adults to improve patient experience and reduce healthcare costs. Even though prior work has evaluated each of these delivery models, we know less about the perceptions and user experiences across these telehealth delivery models for older adults. In the present work, we addressed this research gap by interviewing 16 older adults who had experience using all these telehealth delivery models. We found that the community-based telehealth model with in-person interactions was perceived as the most preferred and useful program, followed by home-based and telephone-based models. Persistent needs reported by participants included ease of access to their historical physiological data, useful educational information for health self-management, and additional health status tracking. Our findings will inform the design and deployment of telehealth technology for vulnerable aging populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38222423PMC10785840W4390889678What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.