COVID-19 vaccine equity and health equity conversations on Twitter.

Nishant R Jain, Iris Zachary, Suzanne A Boren

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nishant R JainMU Institute for Data Science and Informatics, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.

Iris ZacharyMU Institute for Data Science and Informatics, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.

Suzanne A BorenMU Institute for Data Science and Informatics, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study used social network analysis and trending hashtags on Twitter to identify trends related to health and vaccine equity during the Omicron wave. The analysis was conducted using consumer-friendly platforms/tools such as the Healthcare Hashtag Project and NodeXL. The study found that during the Omicron wave, there was a higher volume of tweets related to the more specific hashtag #VaccineEquity, as compared to the more general topic of #HealthEquity. The study also identified the top influencers for these hashtags and how they changed over time. The study proposes a combination of existing tools and approaches, including ontological surveillance and social network analysis, to develop proactive strategies that respond to public opinion in a timely manner. Social network analysis tools could also be useful for healthcare organizations and providers in training their staff involved in social media management to develop better social media communication strategies.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health EquitySocial MediaCommunicationCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID38222403

PMCPMC10785937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.