Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38222383›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2023

Evaluating Deep Learning Performance for P300 Neural Signal Classification.

Yashwanth Ravipati, Nader Pouratian, Corey Arnold, William Speier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yashwanth RavipatiUCLA Computational Diagnostics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Nader PouratianNeurosurgery, University of Texas, Southwestern, Dallas, TX, USA.
Corey ArnoldUCLA Computational Diagnostics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
William SpeierUCLA Computational Diagnostics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

P300 event-related potential (ERP) signals are useful neurological biomarkers, and their accurate classification is important when studying the cognitive functions in patients with neurological disorders. While many studies have proposed models for classifying these signals, results have been inconsistent. As a result, a consensus has not yet been reached on the optimal model for this classification. In this study, we evaluated the performance of classic machine learning and novel deep learning methods for P300 signal classification in both within and across subject training scenarios across a dataset of 75 subjects. Although the deep learning models attained high attended event classification F1 scores, they did not outperform Stepwise Linear Discriminant Analysis (SWLDA) in the within-subject paradigm. In the across-subject paradigm, however, EEG-Inception was able to significantly outperform SWLDA. These results suggest that deep learning models may provide a general model that do not require subject-specific training and calibration in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Brain-Computer InterfacesDeep LearningAlgorithmsElectroencephalographyEvent-Related Potentials, P300HumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID38222383
PMCPMC10785884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.