Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38222379›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2023

Comparative Merits of Available Mortality Data Sources for Clinical Research.

Evan T Sholle, Marcos A Davila, Kristin Kostka, Sajjad Abedian, Marika Cusick, Spencer Krichevsky, Jyotishman Pathak, Thomas R Campion

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Evan T SholleInformation Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Marcos A DavilaInformation Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Kristin KostkaIQVIA, Durham, NC.
Sajjad AbedianInformation Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Marika CusickInformation Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Spencer KrichevskyDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Jyotishman PathakDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.
Thomas R CampionInformation Technologies & Services Department, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obtaining reliable data on patient mortality is a critical challenge facing observational researchers seeking to conduct studies using real-world data. As these analyses are conducted more broadly using newly-available sources of real-world evidence, missing data can serve as a rate-limiting factor. We conducted a comparison of mortality data sources from different stakeholder perspectives - academic medical center (AMC) informatics service providers, AMC research coordinators, industry analytics professionals, and academics - to understand the strengths and limitations of differing mortality data sources: locally generated data from sites conducting research, data provided by governmental sources, and commercially available data sets. Researchers seeking to conduct observational studies using extant data should consider these factors in sourcing outcomes data for their populations of interest.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersInformation SourcesHumans

Identifiers

PMID38222379
PMCPMC10785894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.