Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38222360›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2023

A Systematic Temporal Extraction Pipeline for Medical Concepts in Clinical Notes.

Deahan Yu, Ryan W Stidham, V G Vinod Vydiswaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Deahan YuUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Ryan W StidhamUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
V G Vinod VydiswaranUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With increased application of natural language processing (NLP) in medicine, many NLP models are being developed for uncovering relevant clinical features from electronic health records. Temporal information plays a key role in understanding the context, significance, and interpretation of medical concepts extracted from clinical notes. This is particularly true in situations where the behavior, value, or status of a medical concept changes over time. In this paper, we introduce a systematic framework, NLP annotation-Relaxation-Generation (NRG). NRG compiles incidents of medical concept changes from status annotations and timestamps of multiple clinical notes. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the NRG pipeline by applying it to two medical concepts related to patients with inflammatory bowel disease: extra-intestinal manifestations and medications. We show that the NRG pipeline offers not only insights into medical concept changes over time, but can help convey longitudinal changes in clinical features at both individual and population level.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsMedicineHumansNatural Language Processing

Identifiers

PMID38222360
PMCPMC10785919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.