Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38222339›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2023

Large Language Models for Healthcare Data Augmentation: An Example on Patient-Trial Matching.

Jiayi Yuan, Ruixiang Tang, Xiaoqian Jiang, Xia Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiayi YuanRice University, Houston, TX.
Ruixiang TangRice University, Houston, TX.
Xiaoqian JiangUniversity of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX.
Xia HuRice University, Houston, TX.

Funding

RADx-Rad Discoveries & Data: Consortium Coordination Center Program OrganizationU24LM013755 · NLM · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI ARONOFF-SPENCER, ELIAH S, OHNO-MACHADO, LUCILA · 2021 to 2023
$23.3M
Ethics Core (FABRIC)U54HG012510 · NHGRI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI OHNO-MACHADO, LUCILA · 2022 to 2025
$11.2M
Open Health Natural Language Processing CollaboratoryU01TR002062 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN, LIU, HONGFANG · 2017 to 2021
$7.6M
Finding Combinatorial Drug Repositioning Therapy For Alzheimer'S Disease And Related DementiasR01AG066749 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN, ZHENG, WENJIN JIM · 2020 to 2024
$4.4M
Decentralized differentially-private methods for dynamic data release and analysisR01LM013712 · NLM · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN, OHNO-MACHADO, LUCILA · 2022 to 2025
$2.5M
Robust privacy preserving distributed analysis platform for cancer research: addressing data bias and disparitiesU01CA274576 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JIANG, XIAOQIAN, LONG, QI · 2023 to 2025
$1.2M
NCATS NIH HHS U01 TR002062NCI NIH HHS U01 CA274576NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG012510NIA NIH HHS R01 AG066749NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013712NLM NIH HHS U24 LM013755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of matching patients with suitable clinical trials is essential for advancing medical research and providing optimal care. However, current approaches face challenges such as data standardization, ethical considerations, and a lack of interoperability between Electronic Health Records (EHRs) and clinical trial criteria. In this paper, we explore the potential of large language models (LLMs) to address these challenges by leveraging their advanced natural language generation capabilities to improve compatibility between EHRs and clinical trial descriptions. We propose an innovative privacy-aware data augmentation approach for LLM-based patient-trial matching (LLM-PTM), which balances the benefits of LLMs while ensuring the security and confidentiality of sensitive patient data. Our experiments demonstrate a 7.32% average improvement in performance using the proposed LLM-PTM method, and the generalizability to new data is improved by 12.12%. Additionally, we present case studies to further illustrate the effectiveness of our approach and provide a deeper understanding of its underlying principles.

Indexed as

Computer SecurityElectronic Health RecordsConfidentialityDelivery of Health CareHumansPrivacy

Identifiers

PMID38222339
PMCPMC10785941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.