ArticleJACC. Asia2024
Characteristics, Treatment, and In-Hospital Outcomes of Older Patients With STEMI Without Standard Modifiable Risk Factors.
Article in JACC. Asia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02306616 (Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China: A Collaborative Project of AHA and CSC (CCC Project) - Acute Coronary Syndrome
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reperfusion injury in STEMI: a double-edged sword.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2025Review
- Absence of Standard Modifiable Risk Factors in Middle Eastern Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease. The Jordan Absence of Standard Modifiable Risk Factors (SMuRF-Less) Study.Vascular health and risk management · 2025Article
- Article
- No standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in acute myocardial infarction: prevalence, pathophysiology, and prognosis.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2024Review
- Reply: Patients With STEMI Without Standard Modifiable Risk Factors.JACC. Asia · 2024Article
- Patients With STEMI Without Standard Modifiable Risk Factors.JACC. Asia · 2024Article
- Defining Outcomes in East Asian Elderly STEMI Patients Without Standard Modifiable Risk Factors.JACC. Asia · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Strategies targeting standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs), including hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and smoking, have been well established to prevent coronary heart disease. However, few studies have evaluated the management and outcomes of older patients without SMuRFs after myocardial infarction. Objectives: The authors sought to evaluate the profile of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) aged ≥75 years without SMuRFs. Methods: This study is based on the CCC-ACS (Improving Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China-Acute Coronary Syndrome) project. Patients aged ≥75 years with a first presentation of STEMI were enrolled in this study between November 2014 and December 2019. Modified Poisson regression was used to evaluate the association between SMuRF-less and in-hospital outcomes. Results: Among 10,775 patients with STEMI aged ≥75 years, 1,633 (15.16%) had no SMuRFs. Compared with those with SMuRF, SMuRF-less patients received less evidence-based treatment. In-hospital mortality was similar among patients with and without SMuRFs (5.44% vs 5.14%; Conclusions: Approximately 1 in 7 STEMI patients in China ≥75 years old had no SMuRFs. The similar mortality in patients with and without SMuRF can be partially explained by the inadequate in-hospital treatment of SMuRF-less patients. The quality of care for older patients without SMuRF should be improved. (CCC Project-Acture Coronary Syndrome; NCT02306616).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.