ArticleCureus2023
Safety and Feasibility of Gastrectomy in Super Elderly Patients (Aged ≥ 80): A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe benefits of gastrectomy in elderly patients with gastric cancer (GC) remain unknown. This study was conducted to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of elderly patients with GC (≥ 80 years) who underwent gastrectomy.
methodsWe enrolled 479 patients (Stages I-IV) who underwent gastrectomy with R0-1 resection. The patients were divided into an elderly group (E group; age ≥ 80 years) (n = 115) and a non-elderly group (NE group; age < 80 years) (n = 364). After propensity score matching (PSM) was performed, the short- and long-term outcomes were compared between the groups.
resultsThe rate of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥ IIIa) in the two groups did not differ significantly (p = 0.657). Before PSM, the five-year overall survival (OS, 35.3% vs. 71.7%, p < 0.001) and disease-specific survival (DSS, 56.8% vs. 81.8%, p < 0.001) in the E group were significantly shorter than that in the NE group, respectively. On the other hand, significant differences between the E and NE groups were not shown in either the five-year OS (35.5% vs. 50.8%, p = 0.0985) or the five-year DSS (56.5% vs. 66.9%, p = 0.274) after PSM.
conclusionGastrectomy for elderly patients with GC can be considered safe based on short-term outcomes. In terms of long-term results, elderly patients are not inferior to non-elderly patients if the patients' backgrounds are the same. On the other hand, the long-term outcomes of elderly GC patients who have various comorbidities are not satisfactory, so we should carefully consider the indications for gastrectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.