ArticleCureus2023
Unusual Cause of Artificial Urinary Sphincter Malfunction: Device Entanglement Resulting in Urethral Constriction and Urinary Retention.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urinary retention following placement of an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is not an uncommon complication. We describe a unique case of urinary retention due to AUS entanglement causing urethral constriction in a 72-year-old male. He presented to the emergency department postoperatively following AUS placement with pelvic pain and incomplete emptying. Eventual cystourethroscopy demonstrated severe extrinsic urethral constriction despite the deactivation of the AUS device. Surgical exploration revealed an unexpected looping of the occlusive cuff, causing urethral constriction. Although the precise cause is not clearly known, we suspect that it may have been related to the process of connecting the tubing at the level of the abdomen. Regardless of the underlying etiology, this case highlights a unique complication and supports an assessment of the cuff with direct perineal inspection prior to wound closure and/or with cystourethroscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.