ReviewCureus2023
Safety and Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy in the Treatment of Circumscribed Choroidal Hemangioma: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Choroidal hemangioma excision with retinal pigment epithelium-choroid graft.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Laser Indirect Ophthalmoscopy-Guided Transpupillary Thermotherapy Versus I-125 Plaque Brachytherapy for Choroidal Hemangioma.Cancers · 2025Article
- Management of persistent exudative retinal detachment: exploring etiology and surgical outcomes.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Circumscribed choroidal hemangioma (CCH) is a sort of non-malignant hamartomatous tumor that occurs in the choroidal layer of the eye. It is a rare condition that affects people between their second and fourth decades of life, leading to significant deterioration of vision. One of the most catastrophic consequences of CCH is exudative retinal detachment (ERD), which has a severe impact on vision. This review aims to comprehensively assess the safety and efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) using verteporfin as a therapeutic approach. Using the eligibility criteria, we analyzed the findings of 18 published articles from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane. The standard PDT protocol was used in all included studies, except two (one used half-dose, the other one used the double-dose) with an average of 1-2 sessions. PDT induced substantial tumor regression, with a mean thickness range from 0 to 2.3 mm. However, this contrasted with a previous study that reported a thickness of 3.46 mm as an indication of PDT failure. The mean tumor diameter varied from 4.8 mm to total tumor flattening. A suboptimal effect with a mean diameter ranging from 6mm to 8mm was found in two clinical studies. Significant improvement in vision was observed during the last follow-up, ranging from a normalization of Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) 20/20 to 20/80; counting finger vision persisted in two patients even after treatment. PDT successfully achieved complete subretinal fluid (SRF) resolution in 14 studies and resolved ERD in nine articles. Most studies did not report serious adverse events, but some reported macular atrophy, microcystic degeneration of the retina, transient visual disturbances, Retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) metaplasia, and cystic degeneration of the retina. This systemic review demonstrated PDT's effectiveness and safety as a first-line management modality for CCH. Photodynamic therapy efficiently induced tumor regression, resulting in a notable reduction in both tumor diameter and thickness, with optimal efficacy to improve vision and resolution of the consequences of CCH, such as SRF and ERD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.