Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38222086›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Knowledge, perceptions and practices on healthcare waste management and associated occupational health hazards among healthcare professionals in the Colombo District, Sri Lanka: a cross-sectional study.

Lahiru Udayanga, Loganatahan Sahana, Ayesha Perera, Koshila Ranasinghe, Tharaka Ranathunge

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A case study on healthcare waste management in clinical laboratories in Belo Horizonte city, Brazil.Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lahiru UdayangaDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Plantation Management, Makadura, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka, Kuliyapitiya, Sri Lanka.
Loganatahan SahanaDurdans Hospital, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Ayesha PereraDepartment of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Plantation Management, Makadura, Wayamba University of Sri Lanka, Kuliyapitiya, Sri Lanka.
Koshila RanasingheDepartment of Zoology and Environmental Management, Faculty of Science, University of Kelaniya, Colombo, Sri Lanka.
Tharaka RanathungeDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Faculty of Science, Eastern University, Chenkalady, Sri Lanka.
Wayamba University of Sri Lanka · LKDurdans Hospital · LKUniversity of Kelaniya · LK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Proper Healthcare Waste (HW) management is directly influenced by the knowledge and attitudes of Healthcare Professionals (HCP). However, studies that characterize the knowledge and practices of HCP on HW management are limited in Sri Lanka. This study was conducted to characterize the knowledge, perceptions and practices of HCP on the management of HW and to determine the risk factors influencing HW related occupational health hazards in the Colombo District of Sri Lanka. Methods: A total of 407 HCP were recruited as the study population from selected hospitals in the Colombo District. Information on socio-demographic factors, knowledge, attitudes and practices on HW management were gathered using an interviewer-administrated questionnaire. The Binary Logistic Regression (BLR) was used to determine the socio-economic risk factors associated with the occurrence of HW related health issues among the respondents. Results: The majority of respondents were characterized with a high knowledge level (76.9%) and positive attitudes (53.8%) on HW management. Incineration (82.6%) was recognized as the most widely used HW treatment method. Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was used at a satisfactory level (85.5%), while liquid waste treatment was limited (57.5%). The occupational designation, level of training received in HW management, professional experience, vaccination status for tetanus, degree of knowledge and attitudes on HW management were recognized as significant risk factors ( Conclusion: Even though, the treatment of HW was satisfactory, strengthening the existing mechanisms for monitoring of HW management, provisioning more resources and organizing training and awareness programmes on HW management for HCP are recommended.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansRisk FactorsSri Lankahealthcare wastehealth hazardsknowledge and attitudesoccupational healthSri Lanka

Identifiers

PMID38222086
PMCPMC10786667
OpenAlexW4390273388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.