Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38222081›Full record

ReviewDigital health

Technology adoption of electronic medical records in developing economies: A systematic review on physicians' perspective.

Karyl Claire Derecho, Rentor Cafino, Sarah Lizette Aquino-Cafino, Armando Isla, Jay Ar Esencia, Nove Joshua Lactuan, Jiddo Andrei G Maranda, Lemuel Clark P Velasco

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
25.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impact of Emerging Technologies on Outpatient Care Quality: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karyl Claire DerechoMindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, The Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2209-0103
Rentor CafinoZamboanga City Medical Center, Zamboanga City, The Philippines.
Sarah Lizette Aquino-CafinoZamboanga City Medical Center, Zamboanga City, The Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4401-0803
Armando IslaMercy Community Hospital, Iligan City, The Philippines.
Jay Ar EsenciaLa Paz Municipal Hospital, La Paz, Agusan del Sur, The Philippines.
Nove Joshua LactuanMindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, The Philippines.
Jiddo Andrei G MarandaMindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, The Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5686-8317
Lemuel Clark P VelascoMindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology, Iligan City, The Philippines.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3983-702X
Mindanao State University – Iligan Institute of Technology · PHUniversidad de Zamboanga · PH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) are a tool that could potentially improve the outcomes of patient care by providing physicians with access to up-to-date and accurate vital patient information. Despite this potential, EMR adoption in developing economies has been dilatory. This systematic review aims to synthesize the related literature on the adoption of EMRs in developing economies, with a focus on the perspective of physicians. With the aim to discern the key factors that impact EMR adoption as perceived by physicians and to offer guidance for future research on filling any gaps identified in the existing literature, this study utilized a systematic literature review by following the PRISMA guidelines. Out of 1160 initial articles, 21 were selected for analysis after eliminating duplicates and non-qualifying articles. Results show that common enablers of EMR adoption from physicians' perspective were identified to be computer literacy, education, voluntariness, and the system functionality including its features and user interface, implying that the provision of proper interventions focusing on the aspects of the health information system has an impact in maximizing the utilization and capabilities of EMRs among healthcare providers. The most prevalent barriers include the lack of training and IT usage experience along with resistance to changes associated with respondents' age and gender, the lack of time for learning complex EMR systems, and costs of the new technology. This indicates that a thorough planning and proper budget allocation is necessary prior to implementing and integrating EMR systems in healthcare institutions. From this synthesis of the common research conclusions, limitations, and recommendations from physicians' perspective, the result of this systematic review is expected to shed light on the optimal technology adoption of EMRs and its contribution to the health care systems of developing economies.

Indexed as

developing economiesElectronic health recordelectronic medical recordphysician perspectivetechnology acceptancetechnology adoption

Identifiers

PMID38222081
PMCPMC10787531
OpenAlexW4390823119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.