ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2023
Recent evidence for subcutaneous drains to prevent surgical site infections after abdominal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07274878 (Simple Interrupted Skin Sutures Versus Subcuticular Suture Plus Subcutaneous Drain for Wound Outcomes After Open Appendectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Simple Interrupted Skin Sutures Versus Subcuticular Suture Plus Subcutaneous Drain for Wound Outcomes After Open Appendectomy
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effect of Subcutaneous Negative Suction Drain on Surgical Site Infection Following Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.ANZ journal of surgeryPooled it
- Gunsight closure versus conventional techniques for reversal of protective stoma after rectal cancer surgery: a propensity score matching study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
- Value of a self-made subcutaneous negative-pressure drain in cesarean delivery: a propensity score-matched cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Optimizing Surgical Drain Removal: A Narrative Review of Timing, Criteria, and Evidence-Based Practices.Cureus · 2025Review
- [Prevention and treatment of surgical site infections in abdominal surgery].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgical site infections (SSIs) increase mortality, hospital stays, additional medical treatment, and medical costs. Subcutaneous drains prevent SSIs in gynecological and breast surgeries; however, their clinical impact in abdominal surgery remains unclear.
aimTo investigate whether subcutaneous drains were beneficial in abdominal surgery using a systematic review and meta-analysis.
methodsThe database search used PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library. The following inclusion criteria were set for the systematic review: (1) Randomized controlled trial studies comparing SSIs after abdominal surgery with or without subcutaneous drains; and (2) Studies that described clinical outcomes, such as SSIs, seroma formation, the length of hospital stays, and mortality.
resultsEight studies were included in this meta-analysis. The rate of total SSIs was significantly lower in the drained group (54/771, 7.0%) than in the control group (89/759, 11.7%), particularly in gastrointestinal surgery. Furthermore, the rate of superficial SSIs was slightly lower in the drained group (31/517, 6.0%) than in the control group (49/521, 9.4%). No significant differences were observed in seroma formation between the groups. Hospital stays were shorter in the drained group than in the control group.
conclusionSubcutaneous drains after abdominal surgery prevented SSIs and reduced hospital stays but did not significantly affect seroma formation. The timing of drain removal needs to be reconsidered in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.