ArticleInternet interventions2024
Acceptability and concerns about innovative wearable health sensors in persons with and without chronic disease diagnosis.
Article in Internet interventions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Building trust in long-term care settings using assistive technology: a systematic review.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Usability and Technology Acceptance of a Wearable Monitoring System Among Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases: A Cross-Sectional Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Observational
- Feasibility of integrating genetic risk and digital health tools for cardiovascular prevention: the FitPreV protocol.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Wearable devices and ecological momentary assessment EMA in the workplace: A study protocol on work stress assessment.PloS one · 2026Article
- Recommendations for biomarker data collection in clinical trials by longevity biotechnology companies.npj aging · 2025Article
- Integration of Multi-Modal Biosensing Approaches for Depression: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Editorial for INVENT special issue of the ISRII 2022 meeting.Internet interventions · 2024Article
- Information from ecological momentary assessments lead to over-medicalization: Yes.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2024Article
- Review
- The Living Lab at Home: Feasibility and Acceptability of Multimodal In-Home Data Collection Among Youth Across the Developmental Spectrum.Journal of developmental and behavioral pediatrics : JDBPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in biomedical engineering continue to produce innovative wearable health sensors capable of real-time ambulatory assessments (e.g., of physiology, the environment), holding great potential for advancing precision monitoring and interventions through the integration of such devices and data into eHealth systems. As with any novel device, however, user views on acceptability and concerns about the technology must be evaluated to facilitate widespread implementation and user adoption of such devices. One factor that may strongly influence user views is the potential relevance to, and need for, self-care for chronic disease management. We examined if acceptability and concerns regarding innovative wearable devices differed between individuals living with or without chronic disease. A U.S. adult sample (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.