Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38221865›Full record

Observational studyDeutsches Arzteblatt international2024

The Percentage of Antibiotic Resistance in Uncomplicated Community-Acquired Urinary Tract Infections.

Anja Klingeberg, Niklas Willrich, Marc Schneider, Guido Schmiemann, Ildikó Gágyor, Doreen Richter, Ines Noll, Tim Eckmanns

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Include Earlier Microbiological Results.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Bacterial persisters: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic development.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anja KlingebergDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin; Department 1: Healthcare Research, Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen; Institute for General Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg.
Niklas Willrich
Marc Schneider
Guido Schmiemann
Ildikó Gágyor
Doreen Richter
Ines Noll
Tim Eckmanns
Robert Koch Institute · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUncomplicated bacterial urinary tract infections(uUTIs) are commonly seen in outpatient practice. They are usuallytreated empirically with antibiotics. The pertinent German ClinicalPractice Guideline contains recommendations on antibiotic selection,with the additional advice that the local resistance situationshould be considered as well. However, up-to-date information onlocal resistance is often unavailable, because microbiological testingis mainly recommended for complicated UTIs. Resistance ratesare often higher in recurrent uUTIs than in single episodes. In thisstudy, we aimed to determine the resistance rates of Escherichiacoli (E. coli) in patients with community-acquired uUTIs and tomake these data available to the treating physicians.

methodsIn a nationwide cross-sectional study in Germany (DRKS00019059), we determined the percentages of resistance to antibioticsrecommended for uUTIs (first choice: fosfomycin, nitro -xoline, mecillinam, nitrofurantoin, trimethoprim; second choice:cefpodoxime, ciprofloxacin, cotrimoxazole, levofloxacin, norfloxacin,ofloxacin) over the period 2019-2021. The data were stratified bysingle episodes vs. recurrent UTIs (rUTIs).

resultsData from 2390 subjects were analyzed. E. coli was foundin 75.4% of the samples with positive urine cultures (1082 out of1435). The resistance rate of E. coli in single episodes (n = 725)was less than 15% for all antibiotics tested. In rUTIs(n = 357), resistance rates were also less than 15%for the most part; the only exceptions were trimethoprim(21.4%) and cotrimoxazole (19.3%).

conclusionFor single episodes of uUTI, all of theantibiotics studied can be recommended, at least asfar as their resistance profiles are concerned. Forrecurrent UTI, all but trimethoprim and cotrimoxazolecan be recommended. The second-choice antibioticsexamined do not have a more favorable resistanceprofile than the first-choice antibiotics.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCommunity-Acquired InfectionsUrinary Tract InfectionsAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID38221865
PMCPMC11079811
OpenAlexW4390889483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.